Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:46:06.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using Quantitative TEM Analysis of Implant Damage to Study Surface Recombination Velocity in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jennifer Lee Gasky
Affiliation:
sophya05@hotmail.com, University of Florida, Dept. of Materials Science and Eng., 100 Rhines Hall, P.O. Box 116400, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6400, United States
Sophya Morghem
Affiliation:
sophya05@hotmail.com, University of Florida, Materials Science and Engineering, 100 Rhines Hall, P.O. Box 116400, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6400, United States
Kevin Jones
Affiliation:
kjones@eng.ufl.edu, University of Florida, Materials Science and Engineering, 100 Rhines Hall, P.O. Box 116400, Gainesville, FL, 32611-6400, United States
Get access

Abstract

Silicon wafers with shallow trench isolation structures 3700Å deep were self-implanted with silicon at 40keV, and a dose of 1E15/cm2. This produced an amorphous layer 1000Å deep. The samples were subsequently annealed at temperatures ranging from 750°C to 900°C. The excess interstitials can recombine at the “surface” created by the proximity to the trench sidewall. Plan-view TEM was used to quantify the dislocation distribution as a function of distance from the trench sidewall. It was found that there was no measurable change in defect density as a function of distance from the trench. This was true for both the 20 minute isochronal anneal, and the isothermal study 750°C. This suggests there is a relatively weak recombination of interstitials at the surface. This is surprising given most of the TCAD models assume a very fast surface recombination velocity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Colombeau, B. et al. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 810, 91(2004)Google Scholar
2 Ganin, E. and Marwick, A., Mater. Res. Soc. 147,13 (1989)Google Scholar
3 King, A. C. Journal of Applied Physics, 93, 244 (2003)Google Scholar
4 Claverie, Alain et al. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Vol. 610 (2000)Google Scholar
5 Law, M.E. et al. Journal of Applied Physics, 84, 7 (1998)Google Scholar
6 Lim, D.R., Rafferty, C.S., and Klemens, F. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2302 (1995)Google Scholar