Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Use of Additives for Reducing Hydrogen Yield in Mortar Containing Slag and Chloride Salts

  • Michele A. Lewis (a1) and David W. Warren (a1)

Abstract

Cementitious waste forms are being considered for immobilizing nuclear waste before disposal. In earlier work, it was found that irradiation of a mortar formulation consisting of slag, portland cement, fly ash, water, and up to 10 wt % KCI-LiCl salt resulted in the generation of hydrogen. Yields were relatively high and the rates of generation were constant for the irradiation period investigated. The addition of small amounts of oxygenrich electron scavengers (NaN03, NaI04, KMn04, or Ag20) to the mortar was investigated as a means for reducing hydrogen yields. The addition of NaN03 reduced the hydrogen yield; changed the radiolytic products from hydrogen to a mixture of hydrogen, nitrogen, and N20; and reduced the pressurization rate after exposure to 400 Mrads. The addition of NaI04 and KMn04 reduced hydrogen yields slightly while the addition of Ag20 increased the yield. Moreover, the addition of FeS to a non-slag mortar changed the radiolysis mechanism but the addition of FeO did not. The results of these experiments provided an insight into the nature of the radiolytic reactions occurring in the mortar formulations and indicated that the radiolytic generation of gases might be controlled with the proper choice of additive.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Columbo, P. and Nielson, R. M. Jr, Properties of Radioactive Wastes and Waste Containers, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL-NUREG-50951
2. Bibler, N. E., Radiolytic Gas Production from Concrete Containing Savannah River Plant Waste, DP-1464 (1978).
3. Steindler, M. J. et al., Chemical Technology Division Annual Technical Report 1988, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-89-15 (1988).
4. Fischer, D. F. and Johnson, T. R., Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management, Spectrum '88, Am. Nuc. Soc., LaGrange Park, IL, 102 (1988).
5. Lewis, M. A. and Warren, D. W., presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Am. Cer. Soc., Indianapolis, IN, 1989 (unpublished).
6. Draganic, I. G. and Draganic, Z. D., The Radiation Chemistry of Water, Academic Press, New York, NY (1971).
7. Spinks, J. W. T. and Woods, R. J., An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry, 2nd Ed., J. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY (1976).
8.ASTM C305, Method for Mechanical Mixing of Hydrated Lime for Masonry Purposes (1982).
9.ASTM C109-77, Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (1977).
10. Anbar, M., Bambenk, M., and Ross, A. B., Selected Specific Rates of Reactions of Transients from Water in Aqueous Solution. 1. Hydrated Electron, Supplemental Data, NSRDS-NBS 43, U.S. Dept. Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1973).
11. Lammertz, H. and Kroth, K., Spez. Bev. Kernforschungsanlage Juelich, Juel-Spez-430 (1988).
12. Sonder, E. and Sibley, W. A., Point Defects in Solids, eds. Crawford, J. H. and Stifkin, A., Plenum Press, New York, NY, p. 201 (1971).
13. Levy, P. W., Nuc. Tech. 60, 231 (1983).
14. Lewis, M. A., unpublished results.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed