Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T16:40:28.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrathin Gate Dielectrics grown in Mixtures of N2O and O2 Using Rapid Thermal Oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

John M. Grant
Affiliation:
Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc., 5700 NW Pacific Rim Boulevard, Camas, WA 98607
Tzu-Yen Hsieh
Affiliation:
Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc., 5700 NW Pacific Rim Boulevard, Camas, WA 98607
Get access

Abstract

A study comparing the oxide growth and electrical properties of 60Å oxides grown in different mixtures of O2 and N2O was performed. The oxide growth for all mixtures examined, as well as that of the pure O2 and N2O cases, fit a Deal-Grove oxidation model modified for Rapid Thermal Oxidation (RTO). Linear growth rate constants found for both a simple linear model and the modified Deal-Grove model are significantly greater for mixtures containing only 35% O2 than for pure N2O oxidation. The uniformity of the oxide growth across the wafer for the gas mixtures resembles that seen in pure N2O oxidation rather than pure O2 oxidation. The electrical properties were measured using Surface Photo-Voltage (SPV) techniques along with conventional Capacitance-Voltage (C-V) and Current-Voltage (I-V) techniques. Oxides grown in 100% N2O showed significantly higher oxide charge when compared to oxides grown in 100% O2. An in-situ anneal in an Ar ambient reduces the oxide charge for all gas mixtures examined. The higher oxide charge accompanies an increase in the interface trap density for the oxides grown in 100% N2O. The in-situ anneal reduces the interface trap density for oxide grown in 100% O2 but has little effect for oxides grown in 100% N2O. The interface trap density is reduced by the in-situ annealing for oxides grown in mixtures of O2 and N2O.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hwang, H., Ting, W., Maiti, B., Kwong, D.L., and Lee, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1010 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chu, T.Y., Ting, W., Alhn, J.H., Lin, S., and Kwong, D.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1412 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Carr, E.C. and Buhrman, R.A., Appl. Phys. Lett 63, 54 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Joshi, A.B., Yoon, G., Kim, J., Lo, G.Q., and Kwong, D.L., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 40, 1437 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ting, W., Lo, G.Q., Ahn, J., Chu, T.Y., and Kwong, D.L., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 12, 416 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Ting, W., Hwang, H., Lee, J., and Kwong, D.L., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 1072 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Yoon, G.W., Joshi, A.B., Ahn, J., and Kwong, D.L., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5706 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Kuiper, A.E.T., Pomp, H.G., Asveld, P.M., Bik, W. Arnold, and Habraken, F.H.P.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1031 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Soleimani, H.R., Philipossian, A., and Doyle, B., in Technical Digest of the 1992 IEDM Conference, (IEEE 1992), pp. 629632.Google Scholar
10. Ting, W., Hwang, H., Lee, J., and Kwong, D.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2808 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Okada, Y., Tobin, P.J., Lakhotia, V., Ajuria, S.A., Hegde, R.I., Liao, J.C., Rushbrook, P.P., and Arias, L.J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, L87 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Fukuda, H., Yasuda, M., and Iwabuchi, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 3436 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Chao, T.S., Chen, W.H., Sun, S.C., and Chang, H.Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, L160 (1993).Google Scholar
14. McIntosh, B., Grant, J.M., and Galewski, C., presented at the 1994 MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1994 (to be published in proceedings).Google Scholar