Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T06:08:40.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultra-Thin Carbon Coatings for Head-Disk Interface Tribology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. N. Glosli ,
J. Belak  and
M. R. Philpott
J. N. Glosli
Affiliation:
University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
J. Belak
Affiliation:
University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550
M. R. Philpott
Affiliation:
IBM Research Division, Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120–6099
Get access

Abstract

Molecular dynamics computer simulations of the growth processes and microstructural properties of amorphous carbon (a:C) and amorphous hydrogenated carbon (a:CH) ultra-thin films have been performed. Films 1 to 10 nm thick were grown on a diamond (100) surface using Brenner’s[1–2] bond-order potential for hydrocarbons. The stoichiometry, radial distribution function, chemical bonding (amount of sp2 and sp3 hybridization) and residual stress are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 356: Symposium B2 – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V , 1994 , 749
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brenner, D.W., Phys. Rev. B 42, 9458 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Brenner, D.W., Harrison, J.A., White, C.T., and Colton, R.J., Thin Solid Films 206, 220 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Allen, M.P. and Tildesley, D.J., Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford, Clarendon, 1987).Google Scholar
4. Li, F. and Lannin, J.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1905 (1990).Google Scholar
5. McKenzie, D.R., Muller, D., and Pailthorpe, B.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 773 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2879 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Pailthorpe, B.A., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 543 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Kaukonen, H.-P. and Nieminen, R.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 620 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Wang, C.Z., Ho, K.M., and Chan, C.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 611 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Wang, C.Z. and Ho, K.M., Phys. Rev. Lett, 71, 1184 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Drabold, D.A., Fedders, P.A., and Stumm, P., Phys. Rev. B 49, 16415 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Robertson, J. and O’Reilly, E.P., Phys. Rev. B 35, 2946 (1987).Google Scholar