Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:57:56.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-Mode Magnetic Switching of a Ferromagnetic Nanowire-Granule-Array Embedded in a Porous Silicon Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

K. Rumpf
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Karl-Franzens-UniversityGraz, Universitaetsplatz 5, A-8010 Graz, Austria
P. Granitzer
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Karl-Franzens-UniversityGraz, Universitaetsplatz 5, A-8010 Graz, Austria
H. Krenn
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Karl-Franzens-UniversityGraz, Universitaetsplatz 5, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Get access

Abstract

A low-cost method has been developed to produce metallic, perpendicularly oriented ferromagnetic nanowires embedded in crystalline silicon. The mesoporous silicon structure consists of channels with a diameter of about 60 nm and about 30 μm in depth. The electrochemically prepared ferromagnetic nanosystem is a composition of granules and wires which leads to a peculiar magnetic behaviour. The interesting magnetic properties of this bimodal system are investigated by SQUID-magnetometry. The hysteresis loop shows two switching fields at different magnetic fields, one in the low field range and the other one in the high field range. The first switching field at about 500 Oe is due to the magnetization of the granules, the second switching field nearby 5 T (at room temperature) is caused by dipolar coupling of the nanowires which become single domain at high fields due to Bloch Wall motions. This promising ferromagnetic nanocomposite system is not only interesting in basic research but gives raise to a lot of silicon based applications like spin-injection devices and magnetic field sensors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nielsch, K., Wehrspohn, R.B., Barthel, J., Kirschner, J., Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1360, (2001)Google Scholar
2. Jessensky, O., Müller, F., Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1173, (1998)Google Scholar
3. Masuda, B.C., Yotsuya, M., Asano, M., Nishio, K., Nakao, M., Yokoo, A., Tamamura, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 826, (2001)Google Scholar
4. Kröll, M., Blau, W.J., Grandjean, D., Benfield, R.E., Luis, F., Paulus, P.M., Jongh, L.J. de, JMMM 249, 241, (2002)Google Scholar
5. Granitzer, P., Rumpf, K., Surnev, S.. Krenn, H., JMMM 290-291, 735, 2005 Google Scholar
6. Metzger, R.M., Konovalov, V.V., Sun, M., Xu, T., Zangari, G., Benakli, M., Doyle, W.D., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 36, 30, (2000)Google Scholar
7. Wernsdorfer, W., Doudin, B., Mailly, D., Hasselbach, K., Benoit, A., Meier, J., Ansermet, J. Ph., Barbara, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1873, 1996 Google Scholar
8. Aharoni, A., Phys. Status Solidi 16, 3, 1966 Google Scholar
9. Aharoni, A., Shtrikman, S., Phys. Rev. 10, 1522, 1958 Google Scholar