Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:38:21.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-Length-Scale Structure in Some Computer-Generated Aggregates Grown by Diffusion-Limited Aggregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Paul W. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Giuseppe Pipitone
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri--Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
M. A. Floriano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica, Università di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 26, 90123 Palermo, Italy
E. Caponetri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica, Università di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 26, 90123 Palermo, Italy
R. Triolo
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica, Università di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 26, 90123 Palermo, Italy
Get access

Abstract

The properties of some aggregates “grown” on a computer by diffusion-limited aggregation have been investigated. Calculations showed that the intensity of the small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering from the aggregates was proportional to q−D for qL ≫ 1, where D > 0, L is a length that characterizes the large-scale structure of the aggregate, q = 4πλ−1 sin(θ/2), γ is the wavelength, and θ is the scattering angle. The magnitude of the exponent D was appreciably smaller than the fractal dimensions that many simulations have shown to be typical of the mass fractal aggregates grown by diffusion-limited aggregation. The calculations suggest that the aggregates have structure on two different characteristic-length scales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Meakin, P., Phys. Rev. A 27, 1495 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Meakin, P. and Deutch, J. M., J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2115 (1984).Google Scholar
3. (a) Pearson, A. and Anderson, R. W., Phys. Rev. B 9, 5865 (1993). (b) J. Amar, F. Family, and PM. Lam, Phys. Rev. B B 50, 8792 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Freltoft, T., Kjems, J. K., and Sinha, S. K., Phys. Rev.B 33, 269 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Dietler, G., Aubert, C., Cannell, D. S., and Wiltzius, P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3117 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Vacher, R., Woignier, T., Pelous, J., and Courtens, E., Phys. Rev. B, 37, 6500– (1988).Google Scholar
7. Matsuhita, M., Honda, K., Toyoki, H., Hayakawa, Y, and Kondo, H., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 55, 2618 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Amar, M. B., J. Physique I 3, 353 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Vicsek, T., in Fractal Growth Phenomena, (World Scientific, 1992), Section 5.4.Google Scholar
10. Reference 9, p. 121 and p. 125.Google Scholar
11. Pfeifer, P. and Obert, M., in The Fractal Approach to Heterogeneous Chemistry, edited by Avnir, D., (Wiley, Chichester, England, 1989), Eq. (17), p. 22.Google Scholar
12. Reference 11, Section B1, pp. 1416.Google Scholar
13. Compton, A. H. and Allison, S. K., X-Rays in Theory and Experiment, Van Nostrand, New York, 1935, Eq. (3.55), p. 159.Google Scholar
14. Guinier, A., Fournet, G., Walker, C. B., and Yudowitch, K. L., Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays, Wiley, New York, 1955,, Eq. (39) and Sect. 2.1.3.1, pp. 2428.Google Scholar
15. Meakin, P., private communication.Google Scholar
16. Zhang, H. X., Jun, Sheng, and Wang, H. G., Paper P4.22 presented at the 1993 Fall meeting of the Materials Research Society.Google Scholar