Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T20:54:23.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transient Decay from the Steady-State in Microcrystalline Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

R. Brüggemann
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
S. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
C. Main
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DD1 1HG, Scotland, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

We measured the transient photocurrent decay from the steady state in microcrystalline silicon from plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition and hot-wire chemical vapour deposition. Samples exhibiting a range of photoconductive properties in terms of both the majority and minority carrier mobility-lifetime products or sub-gap absorption coefficients were studied. Measurements were made over a wide range of steady-state photogeneration rates for which we detail the variation with generation rate of the decay time. Samples with a short steady-state photocarrier lifetime show a long decay time. We relate the slow decay process to the much larger density of traps in the band gap in the poor-quality samples. Trapped carriers are released, undergo emission and trapping processes and eventually recombine in these samples, on a much longer time-scale than in the higher-quality samples so that the decay time cannot be taken as a fingerprint for photo-electronic quality. Analytical and numerical modeling indicate bimolecular recombination behavior during the decay. Results are in agreement with free-carrier interaction with exponentially distributed band-tail states.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Moustakas, T. D., and Weiser, K., Phys. Rev. B 12, 2448 (1975).Google Scholar
2. Hoheisel, M. and Fuhs, W., Philos. Mag. B 57, 411 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Adriaenssens, G.J., Baranovskii, S.D., Fuhs, W., Jansen, J., and Öktü, Ö., Phys. Rev. B 51, 9661 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Popovic, P., Bassanese, E., Smole, F., Furlan, J., Grebner, S., and Schwarz, R., J.Appl. Phys. 82, 4504 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Cordes, H., Bauer, G. H., and Brüggemann, R., Phys. Rev. B 58, 16160 (1998)Google Scholar
6. Main, C., Reynolds, S., Zollondz, J., and Brüggemann, R., MRS Symp. Proc. 557, 421 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Brüggemann, R., Kleider, J.P., and Longeaud, C., Proc. 16th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, ed. heer, H. Sc et al., James & James Scient. Publ. London, 2000, p. 645.Google Scholar
8. Main, C., Berkin, J. and Merazga, A., in New Physical Problems in Electronic Materials, edited by Borissov, M. et al. (World Scientific Press, Singapore, 1991) p. 55.Google Scholar
9. Brüggemann, R., Main, C., and Bauer, G.H., MRS Symp. Proc. 258, 729 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Rose, A., RCA Rev. 12, 362 (1951).Google Scholar
11. Schwarz, R., Sanguino, P., Koynov, S., Fernandes, M., Maçarico, F., Louro, P., and Vieira, M., MRS Symp Proc. 609, A32.4 (2001).Google Scholar