Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:25:46.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thin Film Ruthenium Oxide - Iridium Oxide Thermocouples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Kenneth G. Kreider*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Abstract

Ruthenium oxide and iridium oxide have outstanding resistance to corrosion. These oxides are also excellent electrical conductors and have been used as biochemical charge injection electrodes. Their unique electrical and electrochemical properties have also led to their consideration as high temperature pH electrodes. Thin films are the most useful form for these applications as they permit the miniaturization of fast response sensors and electrodes.

This study was used to characterize the thermoelectric and electrical conductance parameters of ruthenium and iridium oxide sputtered thin films. The electric and thermoelectric properties of the thin films were found to be sensitive to the annealing temperature of the sputtered oxides. The properties of the film are related to the microstructure, stoichiometry and crystal structure as determined by x-ray diffraction. Heat treatments were used to stabilize the thermoelectric response and the thermal coefficient of resistivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Johnson, E. A., Harris, L., Phys. Rev. 44, 944945 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Morrison, R. D. and Lachenmayer, R. R., Rev. Sci. Inst. 34, 106 (1963).Google Scholar
3. Marshall, R., Allas, L. and Putner, T., J. Sci. Instrum. 6, 43, 144149 (1966).Google Scholar
4. Grant, H. P., Przybyszewski, J. S. and Claing, R. G., NASA CR-165201, March 1981.Google Scholar
5. Kreider, K. G. and Semancik, S., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A3, (5) 25822586 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Kreider, K. G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4 (6) 26182623 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Morall, T., Wahiduzzaman, S., Fort, E. F., Tree, D. R., DeWitt, D. P. and Kreider, K. G., Society of Automotive Engineers Congress-Technical Paper, Detroit, MI, Feb. 1989.Google Scholar
8. Baeri, P., Campisano, S. V., Rimini, E. and Zhang, J. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45 (4), 384400 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Burgess, D., Yust, M. and Kreider, K. C., Sensors and Actuators, A24, 155160 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Olson, R. and Downey, J., Thin Solid Films 45, 183188 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Reimer, L., Z Natulf 12a 525526 (1957).Google Scholar
12. Horkino, J. and Shaefer, M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 124 8, 1202–1207 (1977).Google Scholar
13. Robblee, L., Lefko, J. and Brummer, S., Jul. Electrochem. Soc. 130 3, 731–733 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Kreider, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4(3), 606607 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Kreider, K., Semancik, S. and Erickson, J., Proc. 4th Int'l Conf. Solid State Sensors (Transducers ′87) 734737, Tokyo, Japan June 2–5, 1987.Google Scholar
16. Tarlov, M. and Kreider, K., Sensors and Actuators, B1, 293297 (1990).Google Scholar
17. Hackwood, S., Boni, G., Dantremont-Smith, W. C., Schiavoup, L. M. and Shay, J. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 37 10, 1264 (1980).Google Scholar
18. Kreider, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4 3, 606–607 (1986).Google Scholar