Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T11:13:14.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermoelectric power, electrical and thermal resistance, and magnetoresistance of nanowire composites.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Joseph P. Heremans*
Affiliation:
Delphi Research Laboratories Shelby Township, MI 48315, U. S. A.
Get access

Abstract

The thermoelectric power of bismuth nanowires is theoretically calculated to be greatly enhanced over that of bulk Bi. This is a result of the size-quantization of the electron wavefunction in nanowires with diameters below 50 nm. The effect is expected to lead to the development of high figure of merit thermoelectric materials. We review here the experimental observation of such enhancement in composites containing nanowires with diameters down to 9 nm. When the wire diameter is further decreased, localization effects take over and limit the thermopower. The theory further predicts the appearance of an energy gap in bismuth nanowires with diameters below 50 nm. We observe such a gap in the temperature dependence of the resistivity. The dependence of the gap on nanowire diameter is consistent with theory. Comparisons of the transport properties of Bi nanowires with those in other nanowire systems show the influence of localization effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Harman, T. C., Taylor, P. J., Walsh, M. P., and LaForge, B. E., Science 297 2229 (2002)Google Scholar
2. Bell, L., Proceedings 21st International Conference on Thermoelectrics (ICT'02, IEEE, Long Beach, California, USA, 2002)Google Scholar
3. Venkatasubramanian, R., Siivola, E., Colpitts, T., O'Quinn, B., Nature 413, 597 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Hicks, L. D. and Dresselhaus, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 46, 16631 (1993)Google Scholar
5. Mott, N. F., Conduction in Non-crystalline Materials (Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
6. Lin, Y-M., Sun, X. X., and Dresselhaus, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 62, 4610 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Heremans, J. P. Thrush, C. M., Lin, Y-M., Cronin, S., Zhang, Z., Dresselhaus, M. S. and Mansfield, J. F., Phys. Rev. B 61, 2921 (2000)Google Scholar
8. Heremans, J. and Thrush, C. M., Phys. Rev. B 59, 12579 (1999)Google Scholar
9. Heremans, J., Thermal Conductivity 25, edited by Morelli, D. T. and Uher, C. (CRC Pr Llc, Lancaster, PA, 1999) pp 114 Google Scholar
10. Michenaud, J-P. and Issi, J-P., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 5, 3061 (1972)Google Scholar
11. Heremans, J. P., Thrush, C. M., Morelli, D. T. and Wu, M-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 206801 (2002)Google Scholar
12. Heremans, J., Thrush, C.M., Lin, Y-M., Cronin, S.B. and Dresselhaus, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 63 085406 (2001)Google Scholar
13. Heremans, J. P., Thrush, C. M., Morelli, D. T. and Wu, M-C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 076804 (2003)Google Scholar
14. Beutler, D. and Giordano, J. J. Phys. Rev. B 38, 8 (1988)Google Scholar
15. Heremans, J., Thrush, C. M., Zhang, Z., Sun, X., Dresselhaus, M. S., Ying, J. Y. and Morelli, D. T. Phys. Rev. B 58, 10091 (1998)Google Scholar
16. Heremans, J. and Thrush, C. M., Phys. Rev. B 59, 12579 (1999)Google Scholar
17. Boxus, J., Heremans, J., Michenaud, J-P. and Issi, J-P., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 9, 2387 (1979).Google Scholar
18. Issi, J-P., Ph.D. Thesis (Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium, 1965)Google Scholar