Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:54:19.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermally Induced Relaxation in GaInNAsSb Quantum Well Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Evan Pickett
Affiliation:
pickett@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Materials Science, 126X CISX, Via Ortega, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States, 650-725-8313
Seth Bank
Affiliation:
sbank@ece.utexas.edu, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States
Homan Yuen
Affiliation:
hyuen@snow.stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
Hopil Bae
Affiliation:
hpbae@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
Tomás Sarmiento
Affiliation:
tsarmie@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
Ann Marshall
Affiliation:
afm@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
James Harris
Affiliation:
harris@snow.stanford.edu, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States
Get access

Abstract

GaInNAsSb quantum wells with GaNAs barriers, grown via molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on 100–oriented GaAs substrates at varying temperatures, were analyzed using photoluminescence (PL), high-resolution x-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS). Samples grown at 420 °C, 440 °C, and 470 °C were analyzed, as were two pieces of the 440 °C growth temperature sample that had been annealed at 740 °C and 820 °C. These measurements showed that the decrease in PL with higher growth temperatures was due to the onset of 3D growth and the nucleation of dislocations. The degradation associated with overannealing was likely due to dislocation nucleation. The poor PL associated with low growth temperatures was due to another mechanism, most likely arsenic anti-site defects. EDS measurements showed greater composition uniformity with lower growth temperatures, as expected, and also showed that there was no ordered indium-rich or indium-poor phase separation at any temperature. Phase separation upon annealing was not observed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Weyers, M., Sato, M., and Ando, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 853 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Geisz, J.F., Friedman, D.J., Olson, J.M., Kurtz, S.R., and Keyes, B.M., J.Cryst. Growth 195, 401 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Volz, K., Gambin, V., Ha, W., Wistey, M.A., Yuen, H.B., R. Bank.|and, S. Harris, J. S., J. Cryst. Growth 251, 360 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Yuen, H.B., Bank, S. R., Bae, H. P., Wistey, M. A., and Harris, J. S. Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 221913 (2006).Google Scholar
5. R. Bank, S., Bae, H. P., Yuen, H.B., Wistey, M. A., Goddard, L. L., and Harris, J.S., Electron. Lett. 42, 156 (2006)Google Scholar
6. Wistey, M. A., Bank, S. R., Bae, H. P., Yuen, H. B., Pickett, E. R., Goddard, L. L., and Harris, J. S., Electron. Lett. 42, 282 (2006).Google Scholar
7. Bank, S. R., Yuen, H. B., Wistey, M. A., Lordi, V., Bae, H. P., and Harris, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 021908 (2005).Google Scholar
8. Bae, H. P., Bank, S.R., Yuen, H. B., Sarmiento, T., Pickett, E. R., Wistey, M. A., and Harris, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett., submitted.Google Scholar
9. Volz, K., Torunski, T., Junert, B., Rubel, O., Nau, S., Reinhard, S., Stolz, W., J. Cryst. Growth, 272, 739 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Young, E. C., Koveshnikov, A. N., Tixier, S., Kavanagh, K. L., and Tiedje, T., phys. stat. sol (a), 202, 2849 (2005).Google Scholar
11. Kong, X., Trampert, A., Tournié, E., and Ploog, K. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 171901 (2005).Google Scholar