Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:07:30.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Stability Study on Cu/Tin/TiSi2/Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Tzong-Sheng Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Wen-Chun Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Lih-Ping Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Jenn-Chang Hwang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Fon-Shan Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated TiN/TiSi2 films as diffusion barriers between copper and silicon. The TiN/TiSi2 films were formed by annealing Ti/Si via rapid thermal process at a temperature of 850'C for 30 seconds in N2 ambient. The contact resistance and leakage current of the Cu/TiN/TiSi 2/n+-p Si contact system were measured after sintering at 350-600°C for 30 minutes in an N2 ambient. We found an abrupt increase of contact resistance occurred at a sintering temperature of 600°C. From the leakage current of n+-p diode, we observed that the thermally stable temperature was about 475ycC. Meanwhile, XTEM photographs showed small Cu3Si crystallites with size of about 0.25 μm precipitated in the n+Si substrate at a sintering temperature 500°C. The formation of Cu3Si increases the occupied volume, generates the gap between TiSi2 and n+Si, and gradually increases the specific contact resistance. SIMS profiles also showed that a certain amount of Cu atoms diffused into the n+-p Si junction and that Si atoms existed in the Cu film. The Cu3Si formation across the n+-p junction can explain the abrupt increase in the leakage current measurement at 500°C. So the failure mechanisms for contact resistance and leakage current are different.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Cross, A., Aboelfotoh, M. O., and Tu, K. N., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 3328 (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Wang, Shi-Qing, Raaijmakers, Ivo, Burrow, Brad J., Suther, Sailesh, Redkar, Shailesh, and Kim, Ki-Bum, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 5176 (1990).Google Scholar
[3] Olowolafe, J. O., Li, Jian, and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6207 (1990).Google Scholar
[4] Olowolafe, J. O., Li, Jian, Blanpain, B., and Mayer, J. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1307 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Chang, Chin-An and Hu, Chao-Kun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 617 (1990).Google Scholar
[6] Wang, Wen-Chun, Chang, Tzong-Sheng, and Huang, Fon-Shan, Solid-State Electrons (to be published).Google Scholar
[7] Murarka, S. P., Silicides for VLSI Applications, Acedemic Press, New York (1983).Google Scholar
[8] Tsui, Bing-Yue and Cheng, Mao-Chien, Solid-State Electrons 35, 1217 (1992).Google Scholar