Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T08:32:25.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon Nitride Thin Film with Evidence of Nanodomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. Chowdhury
Affiliation:
Materials and Surface Science Institute (MSSI), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
M. T. Laugier
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

We have reported the synthesis of carbon nitride thin films with evidence of formation of carbon nanodomes over a range of substrate temperature from 50 °C to 550 °C. An RF magnetron sputtering system was used for depositing carbon nitride films. The size of the nanodomes can be controlled by deposition temperature and increases from 40–80 nm at room temperature to 200–400 nm at high temperature (550 °C). Microstructural characterization was performed by AFM. Electrical characterization shows that these films have conductive behaviour with a resistivity depending on the size of the nanodomes. Resistivity values of 20 mΩ-cm were found for nanodomes of size 40–80 nm falling to 6 m?-cm for nanodomes of size 200–400 nm. Nanoindentation results show that the hardness and Young's modulus of these films are in the range from 9–22 GPa and 100–168 GPa respectively and these values decrease as the size of the nanodomes increases. GXRD results confirm that a crystalline graphitic carbon nitride structure has formed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Liu, A.Y. and Cohen, M.L., Science 245, 841 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Matsumoto, S., Xie, E. Q. and Izumi, F., Diamond and Relat, Mater. 8, 1175 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Niu, C., Lu, Y.Z. and Lieber, C.M., Science 261, 334 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Hellgren, N., Johansson, M. P., Broitman, E., Hultman, L., and Sundgren, J.-E., Phys. Rev. B. 59, 5162 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 15641583 (1992).Google Scholar
6. Chowdhury, S. and Laugier, M.T., physica status solidi (a) 201, R1R4 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Sjostrom, H., Stafstrom, S., Boman, M. and Sundgren, J.-E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1336 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Chowdhury, S. and Laugier, M.T., J. Vac. Sci. and Technol. B : 22, L28L31 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Broitman, E., Hellgren, N., Järrendahl, K., Johansson, M. P., Olafsson, S., Radnoczi, G., Sundgren, J.-E. and Hultman, L., J. Appl. Phys 89, 1184 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Stoney, G.G., Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, A82, 172 (1909).Google Scholar