Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T17:06:23.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Photovoltage Measurement of Minority Carrier Diffusion Lengths Exceeding Wafer Thickness: Application to Iron Monitoring with Part Per Quadrillion Sensitivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

A.M. Kontkiewicz
Affiliation:
Center for Microelectronics Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
J. Lagowski
Affiliation:
Center for Microelectronics Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
M. Dexter
Affiliation:
Center for Microelectronics Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620
P. Edelman
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Diagnostics, Tampa, FL 33610
Get access

Abstract

We discuss an approach to iron concentration determination in silicon, based on wafer-scale surface photovoltage measurement of the minority carrier diffusion length in the millimeter range. The approach combines two novel aspects: it overcomes the diffusion length to wafer thickness ratio limitation of previous SPV methods, and it employs iron separation from other recombination centers using rapid photo-dissociation of iron-boron pairs. The wafer thickness limitation was eliminated by using the correct theoretical SPV wavelength dependence instead of simplified asymptotic diffusion length form adopted in all previous treatments and valid only for diffusion lengths much shorter than the wafer thickness. Photo-dissociation of Fe-B pairs and measurement of the corresponding decrease of the L value (caused by creation of iron intersticials) enables iron detection in typical silicon wafers in times of seconds with a sensitivity in the low 108 atoms/cm3 range.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Jastrzebski, L., Henley, W., and Nuese, C., Solid State Technol. 35, 27 (1992).Google Scholar
[2] Henley, W., Jastrzebski, L. and Haddad, N., Proceedings of the IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, March 1993, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
[3] Lagowski, J., Edelman, P., Dexter, M. and Henley, W., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 7, A185 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Goodman, A.M., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 2551 (1961).Google Scholar
[5] Annual Book of ASTM Standards, F391-90, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1990.Google Scholar
[6] Lagowski, J., Kontkiewicz, A.M., Jastrzebski, L. and Edelman, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (1993).Google Scholar
[7] Quilliet, A. and Gasar, M.P., J. Phys. Radium 21, 575 (1960).Google Scholar
[8] See, for example, Schroeder, D.K., Semiconductor Materials and Device Characterization (Wiley, New York, 1990), Chap. 8, p. 373 and references therein.Google Scholar
[9] Lagowski, J., Edelman, P., Kontkiewicz, A.M., Milic, O., Henley, W., Dexter, M., Jastrzebski, L. and Hoff, A.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (1993).Google Scholar
[10] Zoth, G. and Bergholz, W., J. Appl. Phys 67, 6764 (1990).Google Scholar
[11] Graff, K. and Pieper, H., Electrochem. Soc. 128, 669 (1981).Google Scholar
[12] Wtinstel, K. and Wagner, P., Appl. Phys. A 27, 207 (1982).Google Scholar
[13] Weber, E.R., Appl. Phys. A 30, 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Mishra, K., Electrochem. S oc. Proc. 92-2, Extended Abstracts 426, October 1992, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
[15] Kimmerling, L.C. and Benton, J.L., Physica B 116, 297 (1981).Google Scholar
[16] Yablonovitch, E., Allara, D.L., C.C Chang, Gmitter, T. and Bright, T.B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 249 (1986).Google Scholar