Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T06:55:35.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Chemical Reactions in the Mocvd of Aluminum Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Brian E. Bent
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Ralph G. Nuzzo
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Lawrence H. Dubois
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the deposition of aluminum films by triisobutylaluminum (TIBA) pyrolysis on clean and oxidized Si(lll) (7×7), Si(100) (2×1), and an evaporated aluminum film on silicon. On all of the silicon surfaces, HBA has a very low reaction probability (<0.01). On aluminum, the reaction probability is much higher, and the rate of steady state aluminum deposition is limited by β-hydride elimination from surface-bound isobutyl species to give isobutene and hydrogen. In the steady state deposition of aluminum on top of silicon, gas phase silanes such as isobutyl- and diisobutylsilane are also evolved. This clearly indicates that hydrogen and alkyl ligand transfer from aluminum to silicon (which has diffused up through the growing aluminum film) can occur. We have also found that alkyl species generated on aluminum surfaces by. the adsorption of alkyl iodides have surface chemistries analogous to the aluminum alkyl ligands.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Cooke, M. J., Heinecke, R. A., Stern, R. C. and Maes, J. W. C., Solid State Technol. 25, 62 (1982).Google Scholar
2 Green, M. L., Levy, R. A., Nuzzo, R. G. and Coleman, E., Thin Solid Films 114, 367 (1984).Google Scholar
3 Levy, R. A., Green, M. L. and Gallagher, P. K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 2175 (1984).Google Scholar
4 Ziegler, K., Nagel, K. and Pfohl, W., Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 629, 210 (1960).Google Scholar
5 Malazgirt, A. and Evans, J. W., Metallurgical Trans. B 11B, 225 (1980).Google Scholar
6 Sze, S. M., Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology, (John Wiley, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
7 B. E. Bent, R. G. Nuzzo and L. H. Dubois, in preparation.Google Scholar
8 Ishizaka, A., Nakagawa, K. and Shiraki, Y., Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Molecular Beam Epitaxy and Related Clean Surface Techniques (Japan. Society of Applied Physics, Tokyo, 1982) p. 183.Google Scholar
9 Watson, P. L. and Roe, D. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 6471 (1982).Google Scholar
10 E. Bunel, B. J. Burger and J. E. Bercaw, J. Am. Chem. Soc, in press.Google Scholar
11 Chen, J. G., Beebe, T. P., Crowell, J. E. and Yates, J. T. Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 1726 (1987).Google Scholar