Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T17:29:29.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Characterization of Chemical-Mechanical Polished GaAs by Inclined Bragg Plane Triple Crystal X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Victor S. Wang
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Richard J. Matyi
Affiliation:
Also Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access

Abstract

The incorporation of triple crystal x-ray diffraction (TCD) under conditions of a nearly grazing incident x-ray beam provides a unique capability to characterize surface and subsurface structural damage. The effects of bromine-methanol chemical-mechanical (CM) polishing on the surface quality of GaAs were investigated by inclined Bragg plane triple crystal x-ray diffraction. GaAs samples polished under varying conditions of Br2 concentration, total polish time, polish wheel rotation speed, and force exerted on the samples were analyzed using TCD profiles from inclined (220) planes, with the samples oriented at both the exact Bragg condition, θB, and at deviations from the exact Bragg condition. As the deviation from the 220 reciprocal lattice point was increased, multiple peaks corresponding to both the dynamic and the kinematic components were observed. The peak positions and the relative intensities of the various peaks were used to characterize the effects of the CM polishing variables on the GaAs surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jensen, E.W., Solid State Technology, 49 (1973).Google Scholar
2. Gormley, J.V, Manfra, M.J., and Calawa, A.R., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 1256 (1981); T. Hamaguchi, M. Kimura, K. Egami, and N. Endo, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 55 1867 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chin, B.H. and Barlow, K.L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 3120 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Dyment, J.C. and Rozgonyi, G.A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 118, 1346 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Reisman, A. and Rohr, R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 111, 1425 (1964).Google Scholar
6. Chin, B.H. and Lee, K.L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 663 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Kuwamoto, H., Holmes, D.E., and Otsuka, N., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 1579 (1987)..Google Scholar
8. Hang, Z., Shen, H., and Pollak, F.H., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3233 (1988); T. George, Z.L. Weber, E.R. Weber, and F.H. Pollak, J. Appl. Phys., 67 4363 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Wang, V.S. and Matyi, R.J., J. Elect. Mat. 21(1), 23 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Afanas'ev, A.M., Afanasiev, S.M., Aleksandrov, P.A., Imamov, R.M., and Pashaev, E.M., Phys. Stat. Sol. A86, K1 (1984); A.M. Afanas'ev, P.A. Aleksandrov, R.M. Imamov, E.M. Pashaev, and V.I. Polovinkina, Phys. Stat. Sol., A90, 419 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Afanas'ev, A.M., Aleksandrov, P.A., Imamov, R.M., Lomov, A.A., and Zavyalova, A.A., Acta Cryst. A41, 227 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Iida, A. and Kohra, K., Phys. Stat. Sol. A51, 533 (1979).Google Scholar
13. Kazimirov, A. Y., Kovalchuk, M.V, and Kohn, V.G., Acta Cryst. A46, 643 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Lomov, A.A., Zaumseil, P., and Winter, U., Acta Cryst. A41, 223 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Zaumseil, P. and Winter, U., Phys. Stat. Sol. A120, 67 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Afanas'ev, A.M., Koval'chuk, M.V., Lobanovich, E.F., Imamov, R.M., Aleksandrov, P.A., and Melkonyan, M.K., Kristallografiya 26, 28 (1981) [Soy. Phys. Crystallogr. 26 (1), 13 (1981)].Google Scholar
17. Zaumseil, P., Winter, U., Vartanyants, I.A., and Kharitonov, I.Y., Phys. Stat. Sol. A121, K149 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar