Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Substrate Surface Treatments and “Controlled Contamination” in GaN / Sapphire MOCVD

  • Yuval Golan (a1) (a2), Paul Fini (a1), Steven P. Denbaars (a1) and James S. Speck (a1) (a2)

Abstract

We have used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to study the effect of common substrate surface treatments for the metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) of GaN on sapphire. It appears that contaminants play a major role in the surface chemistry and strongly influence the morphology of the treated surfaces. In order to investigate the role of these contaminants, we have introduced the concept of “controlled contamination” (CC), namely, exposure of the sapphire surfaces to controlled amounts of potential contaminants in-situ and investigation of the resulting sapphire morphology. The results showed that sapphire, considered to be a very stable oxide surface, is clearly reactive in the GaN MOCVD chemical environment at the high temperatures (HT) employed, allowing us to use CC for obtaining sapphire substrates with controlled roughness. Nevertheless, epitaxial growth using the two-step GaN MOCVD process appears to be very robust and practically insensitive to the (submicronscale) substrate morphology.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Ponce, F. A., Bour, D. P., Gotz, W., Johnson, N. M., Helava, H. I., Grzegory, I., Jun, J. and Porowski, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 p. 917 (1996).
2. Vaudo, R. P., Phanse, V. M., Wu, X. H., Golan, Y. and Speck, J. S., 2nd Intl. Conf. on Nitride Semiconductors (Tokushima, Japan, 1997).
3. Gotz, W., Romano, L. T., Krusor, B. S., Johnson, N. M. and Molnar, R. J., Appl. Phys..Lett. 69 p. 242 (1996).
4. Amano, H., Sawaki, N., Akasaki, I. and Toyoda, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48 p. 353 (1986).
5. Wu, X. H., Fini, P., Keller, S., Tarsa, E. J., Heying, B., Mishra, U. K., DenBaars, S. P. and Speck, J. S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35 p. L1648 (1997).
6. Mitha, S., Clark-Phelps, R., Erickson, J. W. and Gao, Y., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (San Francisco, CA 1997), in press.
7. Popovici, G., Kim, W., Botchkarev, A., Tang, H., Solomon, J. and Morkoc, H., Mat. Res.Soc. Symp. Proc. (San Francisco, CA 1997), in press.
8. Marasina, L. A., Malinovsky, V. V., Pichugin, I. G. and Prentky, P., Crystal Res. and Technol. 17 p. 365 (1982).
9. It is often seen that samples cleaved from the same wafer show different spacing of the miscut steps. This presumably indicates slight variations in the surface curvature atvarious points in the wafer.
10. Dryburgh, P. M., J. Crystal Growth 94 p. 23 (1989).
11. Brewer, L. and Searcy, A. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 p. 5308(1951).
12. Wu, X. H., Brown, L. M., Kapolnek, D., Keller, S., Keller, B., DenBaars, S. P. and S.Speck, J., J. Appl. Phys. 80 p. 3228 (1996).
13. Heying, B., Wu, X. H., Keller, S., Kapolnek, D., Keller, B. P., DenBaars, S. P. and Speck, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 p. 643 (1996).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed