Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:39:10.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of Quasi-Breakdown Mechanism in Ultrathin Gate Oxide Under Various Types of Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Hao Guan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260
Zhen Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260
Byung Jin Cho
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260
M. F. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260
Y. D. He
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260
Get access

Abstract

The quasi-breakdown (QB) in ultra thin gate oxide is investigated through the observation of defect generation during high field F-N stress and substrate hot hole and hot electron stresses. The interface trap density increases during stress and reaches to a same critical amount at the onset point of QB regardless of stress current density and stressing carrier type. The experiments also show that hot carriers are much more effective to trigger QB than F-N electrons at the same current level. This can be ascribed to the fact that hot carrier has much higher interface state generation rate than F-N electron does. All results consistently support the interface damage model for the QB occurrence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lee, S. H., Cho, B. J., Kim, J. C. and Choi, S. H., IEDMtech Dig., p. 605, 1994.Google Scholar
2.Okada, K., Kawasaki, S., and Hirofuji, Y., Ext. Abst. of 1994 Int. Conf. Solid State Devices and Materials, p. 565, 1994.Google Scholar
3.Depas, M., Nigam, T., and Heyns, Marc M., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 43, p. 1499, 1996.Google Scholar
4.Okada, K., Taniguchi, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 70, p. 371, 1997.Google Scholar
5.Umeda, K. and Taniguchi, K, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 297 (1997).Google Scholar
6.Neugroschel, A., Sah, C. T., Han, K. M., Carroll, M. S., Nishida, T., Kavalieros, J. T., and Lu, Y., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 42, p. 1657, 1995.Google Scholar
7.Jie, B. B., Li, M. F., Lou, C. L., Chim, W. K, Chan, D. S. H., and Lo, K. F., IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 18, p. 583, Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
8.Groeseneken, G., Maes, H. E., Beltran, N. and Keersmaecher, R. F. D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 31, p. 42, 1984.Google Scholar
9.Okada, Y., Tobin, P. J., Reid, K.G., Hegde, R. I., Maiti, B., Ajuria, S. A., Symp. on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 105 (1994).Google Scholar
10.Kamakura, Y., Utsunomiya, H., Tomita, T., Umeda, K., and Taniguchi, K., IEDM Tech. Digest, 81 (1997).Google Scholar
11.DiMaria, D. J., Cartier, E., and Arnold, D., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 3367 (1993).Google Scholar
12.Takeda, E., Shimizu, A., and Hagiwara, T., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL–4, 329 (1983).Google Scholar