Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T01:32:15.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of Damage in Silicon Created By and P+ Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Fang Ziwei
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Laboratory Shanghai Institute of Metallurgy, Academia Sinica Shanghai 200050, China
Lin Chenglu
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Laboratory Shanghai Institute of Metallurgy, Academia Sinica Shanghai 200050, China
Tsou Shihchang
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Laboratory Shanghai Institute of Metallurgy, Academia Sinica Shanghai 200050, China
Get access

Abstract

The damage and annealing behavior of <100> Si implanted at room temperature by and P+ at different energies (5-600KeV) and intermediate dose (∼1014/cm2) has been investigated. Experimental results show that the damage created by implantation is always greater than that of P+ implantation. The ratio of total displaced atoms of the target cuased by molecular and atomic implantation, ND(mol)d/ND(atom) reached a maximal value at 100KeV () and 50KeV (P+) after rapid thermal annealing, the carrier concentration profiles measured by spreading resistance measurements are also different for the and P+ implanted samples. We attribute essentially this phenomenon to the displacement spike, but the multiple collision effect and the interaction between two molecular fragments should be considered while the incident energy is high.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thompson, D.A., Johar, S.S., Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 170(1980) 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Thompson, D.A., Radiation Effects, 1981, Vol.56, p105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Grob, A., Brob, J.J. and Golanski, A., Nucl.Instr. and Meth. B19/20 (1987) p55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gemmell, D.S., Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 194 (1982) p 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Thompson, D.A. and Walker, R.S., Radiation Effects, 36 (1978) 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Qehrlein, G.S. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45 (1984) 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sigmund, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, No.3, 169 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar