Skip to main content Accessibility help

Studies of the Relationship between Megasonics, Surface Etching, and Particle Removal in SC-1 Solutions

  • S. L. Cohen (a1), D. Rath (a1), G. Lee (a2), B. Furman (a1), K. R. Pope (a1), R. Tsai (a1), W. Syverson (a3), C. Gow (a3) and M. Liehr (a1)...


Wafer cleaning studies have been performed so as to understand the influence of acoustic (megasonic) energy on particle removal in dilute SC-1 solutions. Surface etching alone (up to 60Å) has been found to be insufficient to completely remove silicon nitride surface particles from native oxide surfaces in the absence of megasonics. For megasonic cleaning processes the minimum surface etching required for complete nitride particle removal is significantly lower (between 3–12Å) than for a non-megasonic process. The exact 'threshold' for surface etching will depend on the chemical nature of the particle/surface and the megasonics power. Megasonics energy does not appear to enhance chemical etching of the substrate, at least for silicon oxide substrates, however, it significantly improves particle removal. This data suggests that the particle removal process can benefit from both a thermally activated component (etching) as well as an acoustic component (cavitation/ acoustic streaming).



Hide All
1 Ohmi, T., Proceedings of the Inst. of Environ. Sci. 287–296 (1992).
2 Meuris, M., Heyns, M., Mertens, P.W., Verhaverbeke, S. and Philipossian, A., Microcontamination 10(2), 31 (1992).
3 Cohen, S.L., Syverson, W., Basiliere, S., Fleming, M.J., Furman, B., Gow, C., Pope, K., Tsai, R., Liehr, M., Proceedings of the Ultraclean Processing of Silicon Surfaces Conference, Sept. 19–21, 1994, Binges, Belgium
4 Resnick, P.J., Adkins, C.L.J., Clews, P.J., Thomas, E.V. and Cannaday, S.T., Syrup. on Cleaning Tech. in Semi. Dev. Mfg., 184th ECS Mtg (New Orleans, LA, Oct 10–15 1993).
5 Jan, D. and Raghavan, S., Symp. on Cleaning Semi. Device Mfg., 184th ECS Mtg (New Orleans, LA, Oct 10–15, 1993).
6 a) Riley, D. J., Carbonell, R.G., Colloid, J. Interface Sci, (1993) b) D. J. Riley, R.G. Carbonell, Journal of the IES, 28, Nov/Dec 1991 c) R.P. Donovan, Spring MRS meeting procedings (San Francisco 1993).
7 lteyns, M.M., Verhaverbeke, S., Meuris, M., Mertens, P.W., Schmidt, H.F., Kubota, M., Philipossian, A., Dillenbeck, K., Graf, D., Schnegg, A. and deBlank, R., Materials Research Society Meeting (San Francisco CA, Apr. 12–16, 1993).
8 Busnaina, A.A., Gale, G.W., Kashoush, I.I., Precision Cleaning, Vol II, (1994) p 13.
9 PuIttennan, S.J., Scientific American, Feb 1995, p 46.
10 Zhang, D., Kittelson, D.B., Liu, B., Microcontamination Conf. Proceedings, San Jose, CA Oct 4–6 1994 p. 215.
11 Schmidt, H.F., Meuris, M., Mertens, P.W., Verhaverbeke, S., Heyns, M.M., Hellemans, L., Snauwaert, J. and Dillenbeck, K., Symp. on Cleaning Technology in Semi. Device Mfg., 184th ECS Mtg (New Orleans, LA, Oct 10–15, 1993).
12 Furman, B.K., paper presented in this symposium, MRS San Francisco 1995
13 Rath, D.L., Abramovich, F., Cohen, S. L., Gow, C., Hevey, M., Ouimet, G., unpublished results


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed