Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Structure and Mechanical Properties of Ru-Cu and Ru-Ti Nanolayer Composites

  • H. Kung (a1), M. Nastasi (a1), T. R. Jervis (a1), K.M. Hubbard (a1), R.M. Messner (a2), T.E. Mitchell (a1) and J.D. Embury (a3)...

Abstract

Multilayers of Ru-Cu and Ru-Ti have been prepared by electron beam evaporation technique. One set of composites has Ru thickness varying from 250 to 2500Å alternating with Cu or Ti of 15Å. The other set has 250Å of Ru and the Cu or Ti layer varies between 15 and 200Å. Nanoindentation measurements show that there is no significant change in hardness as either Ru or Cu/Ti thickness varies. However, the Ru-Cu multilayer has twice the hardness of the Ru-Ti system. High resolution transmission electron microscopy discloses that there is an epitaxial orientation relationship between Ru and Ti in Ru-Ti while no such relationship exists in Ru-Cu.

The strengthening mechanism proposed by Koehler [1] predicts that Ru-Ti composites should have a higher strength than Ru-Cu due to the larger modulus difference between Ru and Ti. The discrepancy between the prediction and the experimental results suggests that other strengthening mechanism(s) may be operating. We have proposed two models based on a "shear" mechanism to explain the differences observed between these two systems. The effects of these mechanisms in controlling the deformation process in nanolayer composites are discussed.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1 Koehler, J.S., Phys. Rev. B2, 547 (1970).
2 Lehoczky, S.L., J. Appl. Phys. 49., 5479 (1978).
3 Lehoczky, S.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1814 (1978).
4 Kelly, A., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A322. 409 (1987).
5 Pethica, J.B., in Ion Implantation into Metals, edited by Ashworth, V., Grant, W.A., and Proctor, R.P.M. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982), pp. 147156.
6 Oliver, W.C., Hutchings, R., and Pethica, J.B., ASTM Spec. Tech. Pub. 889, 90 (1986).
7 Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7 1564 (1992).
8 Fabes, B.D., Oliver, W.C., McKee, R.A. and Walker, F.J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 3056 (1992).
9 Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).
10 Gschneidner, K.A. Jr., " Physical Properties and Interrelationships of Metallic and Semimetallic Elements" in Solid State Physics. Vol. 6, edited by Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D..
11 Castell, M.R., Howie, A., Perovic, D.D., Whitehead, A.J., Ritchie, D., Churchill, A. and Jones, G.A.C., in The Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Materials Having Ultra-Fine Microstructures. edited by Nastasi, M. et al. , pp. 489494.
12 Ashby, M.F., Blunt, F.J. and Bannister, M., Acta metall. 37, 1847 (1989).

The Structure and Mechanical Properties of Ru-Cu and Ru-Ti Nanolayer Composites

  • H. Kung (a1), M. Nastasi (a1), T. R. Jervis (a1), K.M. Hubbard (a1), R.M. Messner (a2), T.E. Mitchell (a1) and J.D. Embury (a3)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed