Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T19:00:01.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sorption Mechanism of Pu, Am and Se on Sodium-Bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Tomoki Shibutani
Affiliation:
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokai Works, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki-ken, 319-11, JAPAN.
Mikazu Yui
Affiliation:
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokai Works, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki-ken, 319-11, JAPAN.
Hideki Yoshikawa
Affiliation:
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokai Works, Tokai-mura, Ibaraki-ken, 319-11, JAPAN.
Get access

Abstract

The distribution coefficients (Kd) were measured for Pu, Am and Se on sodium-bentonite in bentonite-equilibrated distilled water in a pH range 4~ 10. Sodium-bentonite includes sodium-montmorillonite and ferrous minerals such as pyrite. The experiments were carried out by using the batch method under aerobic conditions for Pu, Am and under anaerobic conditions for Se. The distribution coefficients for Pu and Am were in the range 100 ~ 102m3/kg on sodium-bentonite in the above pH range. The sorption of Pu and Am was modeled by ion exchange of these cationic aqueous species with interlayer cations of sodium-bentonite. The distribution coefficients of Se on sodium-bentonite were interpreted by using a surface complexation model. The model was based on the assumption that the sorption behavior was dominated by ferric-oxyhydroxide, goethite, coating on the surface of pyrite. Sorption behavior of Am in compacted bentonite were also discussed by using cation exchange model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Bond, K.A., Haworth, A., Sharland, S.M.,Smith, A.C. and Tweed, C.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 212, 585592(1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Stammose, D., Pitsch, H., and Dolo, J.M., Applied Clay Science 7, 225238 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Debbio, A.D., Radiochimica Acta 52/53, 181186 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Parkurst, D., Thorstenson, D.C. and Plummer, L.N., U.S.Geological Survey, Water-respires investigations, 80-96(1980).Google Scholar
5 Cross, J.E., Ewart, F.T. and Tweed, C.J., AERE-R12324 (1987).Google Scholar
6 Rai, D., Stricken, R.G., Moore, D.A. and Ryan, J.L.. Radiochimica Acta 33, 201206 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Felmy, A.R., Rai, D. and Fulton, R.W., Radiochimica Acta 50, 193204 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Sato, H., Ashida, T., Kohara, Y., Yui, M. and Sasaki, N., Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 29 (9), 873882(1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Fletcher, P. and Sposito, G., Clay Minerals 24, 375391, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Wanner, H., EIR-Bericht Nr. 589 (1986).Google Scholar
11 Yui, M., Shibata, M., Makino, H., Sasaki, Y., Umeki, H., Ishiguro, K., Ishikawa, H., Neyama, A. and Chiba, Y., PNC TN 8410 92-162 (1992)(in Japanese).Google Scholar
12 Dzombak, D.A. and Morel, F.M.M., Surface complexation modeling, Wiley-Interscience, New York, (1990).Google Scholar
13 Bradbury, M.H. and Baeyens, B., Radionuclide sorption from the safety evaluation perspective, Proceedings of NEA workshop (1992).Google Scholar
14 Papelis, C., Hayes, K.F. and Leckie, J.O., Technical Report No.306(Environmental Engineering and Science, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, CA) (1988).Google Scholar
15 McKinley, I.G. and Hadermann, J., EIR-Bericht Nr. 550 (1984).Google Scholar
16 Sato, H., Ashida, T., Kohara, Y. and Yui, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 294, pp.403408 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar