Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T10:53:50.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silicon Nitride Optimisation for a-Si:H TFTs Used in Projection LC-TVs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

I. D. French
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, Cross Oak Lane, Redhill, RH1 5HA, England.
C. J. Curling
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, Cross Oak Lane, Redhill, RH1 5HA, England.
A. L. Goodyear
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, Cross Oak Lane, Redhill, RH1 5HA, England.
Get access

Abstract

Multi-layer devices based on thin films in Large Area Electronics have different intrinsic and extrinsic properties that must be optimised to produce the correct physical shape of the device, in addition to having acceptable electrical characteristics. For instance it is quite easyto produce individual layers optimised for electrical performance that will physically “pull off” underlying films, or result in poor step coverage. The factors that must be considered include mechanical stress, etching rates and profiles, thickness and stoichiometry uniformity, and thermal budgets, as well as electrical characteristics. This paper gives an example of silicon nitride optimisation for use in a-Si:H TFT projection displays. Three different silicon nitride layers were included to give a storage capacitor, together with controlled etch profiles for step coverage. The layers were optimised with respect to several different parameters in the minimum number of depositions by the use of experimental design techniques.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Chapman, J A, George, D S, Clarke, J A, Hughes, J R, Pearson, A D, Winkle, R V, Wright, N K, Eurodisplay '93 Conference Proceedings, 275, (1993)Google Scholar
[2] Berkel, C van, Bird, N C, Curling, C J, French, I D, MRS Proc. 297, 939, (1993)Google Scholar
[3] Powell, M J, French, I D, Hughes, J R, Bird, N C, Davies, O S, Glasse, C, Curran, J E, MRS Proc. 2.58, 1127 (1992)Google Scholar
[4] Kobayashi, I, Ogawa, T, Hotta, S, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 336, (1992)Google Scholar
[5] Powell, M J, Deane, S C, Milne, W I, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 207, (1992)Google Scholar
[6] Bohn, P W, Manz, R C, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1981, (1985)Google Scholar
[7] Riley, P E, Turley, A P, Malkowski, W J, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 1112, (1989)Google Scholar
[8] Mason, R L, Gunst, R F, Hess, J L, Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments (Wiley, New York, 1989) p. 574 Google Scholar
[9] Smith, D L, Alimonda, A S, Chen, C C, Ready, S E, Wacker, B, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 614, (1990)Google Scholar
[10] Libsch, F R, Kanicki, J, SID 93 Digest, 455, (1993)Google Scholar