Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T19:57:27.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Si(100) Surface Preparation by In-Situ or in-Vacuo Exposure to Remotely Plasma-Generated Atomic Hydrogen: Applications to Deposited SiO2 and Epitaxial Growth of Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

T. Yasuda
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
Y. Ma
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
S. Habermehl
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
S. S. Kim
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
T. P. Schneider
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
J. Cho
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
R. J. Nemanich
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This paper addresses the in-situ/in-vacuo preparation of Si (100) substrates by hydrogen plasma cleaning prior to low temperature deposition of SiO2, or epitaxial growth of Si or Ge. The paper emphasizes the effectiveness of this type of substrate surface preparation following ex-situ wet-cleaning procedures that include: i) conventional RCA cleans; ii) modified RCA cleans, which incorporate exposure of the Si substrate to ozone, O3; and iii) ozone exposure, with all of these terminated by the removal of sacrificial oxides by dilute HF. We conclude: i) all ex-situ surface cleaning of Si (100) substrates leaves behind sub-monolayer oxygen and carbon surface contamination; ii) that virtually all of the carbon can be removed by exposure of the Si surface to atomic hydrogen at a temperature of <300°C; and iii) that a necessary condition for: (a) the formation of Si/SiO2 interfaces with low defect densities, Dit<l−3×1010cm−2-eV−1, and (b) the growth of epitaxial films of Si; is that the processed Si surface exhibit a 2×1 reconstruction, as detected by LEED or RHEED, following the exposure to atomic hydrogen.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kim, S.S., Tsu, D.V., Lucovsky, G., Fountain, G.G. and Markunas, R.J., MRS Symp. Proc. 146, 265 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Lucovsky, G., Tsu, D.V., Parsons, G.N. and Kim, S.S., SPIE Proc. 1037, 52 (1988);Google Scholar
Fitch, J.T., Sumkeris, J.J. and Lucovsky, G., SPIE Proc. 1188, 43 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Lucovsky, G., Kim, S.S., Fitch, J.T., Rudder, R.A., Fountain, G.G., Hattangady, S.V. and Markunas, R.J., J.Vac. Sci. Technol A, (1991), in press.Google Scholar
4. Fountain, G.G., Rudder, R.A., Hattangady, S.V., Markunas, R.J. and Lindorme, P.S., J. App. Phys. 63, 4744 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Kim, S.S., Stephens, J., Lucovsky, G., Fountain, G.G., and Markunas, R.J., J. Vac. Sci.and Technol. A 8 2039 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Private communication: R.J. NemanichGoogle Scholar
7. Schneider, T.P., Cho, J., Vander-Weide, J., Wells, S.E., Kim, S.S., Lucovsky, G., Nemanich, R.J., Rudder, R.A. and Markunas, R.J., Pressented at Fall 1990 MRS Meeting, Symposium E.Google Scholar
8. Rudder, R.A., Fountain, G.G. and Markunas, R.J., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3519 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Choi, S.S. and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 1198 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Stephens, D., He, S.S. and Lucovsky, G., unpublished results.Google Scholar