Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Role of AlN Interlayer in AlxGa1-xN/GaN Heterostructures with high x from 0.35 to 0.50 Grown on Sapphire (0001)

  • In-Seok Seo (a1), Seung-Jae Lee (a1), Seong-Hwan Jang (a1), Jeong-Mo Yeon (a1), Jae-Young Leem (a2), Yong-Jo Park (a3) and Cheul-Ro Lee (a1)...


We report the role of thin AlN interlayer in the fabrication of AlxGa1-xN/GaN heterostructures with high x from 0.35 to 0.50 on sapphire (0001) by MOVPE. After growing the AlN interlayer of 20 nm thick on GaN/sapphire (0001) epitaxy, the AlxGa1-xN epitaxial layers of 1.0 um thick were grown on it with increasing the flow rate of TMA. The measured Al mole fractions of AlxGa1-xN/GaN heteroepitaxy grown using the thin AlN interlayer from each TCD rocking curve are 0.35, 0.37, 0.45 and 0.50, respectively. As incorporation rate of Al in the AlxGa1-xN increases, the crystallinity is getting well and the RMS values scanned by AFM of their surfaces become lower. And also, the optoelectronic characteristics of those heteroepitaxy evaluated by cathodeluminescence(CL) are improved with the increase of x. To the contrary these trends, it is usually known that crystallinity, surface morphology and optical property of the AlxGa1-xN/GaN heteroepitaxy grown without AlN interlayer between them become worse with the increase of x above 0.2. Meanwhile, electrical resisitivities of Al0.35Ga0.65N, Al0.37Ga0.63N, Al0.45Ga0.55N and Al0.50Ga0.50N epitaxy, which were grown with the thin AlN interlayer, measured by four point probing method are 13.5, 18.1, 31.7 and 36.2 Mohm-cm, respectively. These resisitivities increase by degrees in spite of the advance of characteristics with the raising of x.



Hide All
1. Nakamura, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A13 (1995)705
2. Itaya, K., Onomura, M., Nishio, J., Sugiura, L., Saito, S., Suzuki, M., Rennie, J., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 35(1996)L1315
3. Akasaki, I., Sota, S., Sakai, H., Tanaka, T., M.Koike, Amano, H., Electron lett., 32(1996)1105
4. Yu, G., Ishikawa, H., Umeno, M., Egawa, T., Watanabe, J., Jimbo, T., Soga, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 72(1998)2202
5. Garrido, J. A., Sanchez-Rojas, J. L., Jimez, A., Munoz, E., Omnes, F., Gibart, P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 75(1999)2407
6. Bergman, J. P., Lundstrom, T., Monemer, B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 74(1998)3456
7. Huang, Tzu-fang, Harris, James S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 72(1998)1158
8. Webb, J. B., Tang, H., Rolfe, S., Bardwell, J. A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 75(1999)953
9. Lee, Cheul-Ro, J. Crys. Growth, 220(2000)62
10. Khan, M. A., Skogman, R. A., Schulze, R. G., Gershenzon, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 43(1983)492
11. Lee, H. G., Gershenzon, M., Goldenberg, B. L., J. Electron. Mater. 20(1991)621
12. Bremser, M. D., Perry, W. G., Zheleva, T., Edwards, N. V., Nam, O. H., Parihh, N., Aspnes, D. E., Davis, R. F., MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicon. Res, 1(1996)8
13. Lee, C. R., Son, S. J., Lee, I. H., Lee, J. Y., Noh, S. K., J. Crystal Growth 182(1997)11


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed