Skip to main content Accessibility help

Rheology Optimization of Particle Modified Consolidants

  • Eleni Aggelakopoulou (a1), Pamela Charles (a1), Matilde E. Acerra (a1), Ana I. Garcia (a1), Robert J. Flatt (a1) and George W. Scherer (a1)...


Ethyl silicate-based consolidants are used to restore strength to degraded stones. One of the limitations of strength development using these products is their reported cracking behavior during drying. Particle Modified Consolidants (PMC) consist of a silicate matrix plus colloidal oxide particles. The presence of particles physically limits the silicate network from shrinking under capillary pressures, and thereby reduces strength loss during drying. In addition, the network maintains a higher permeability, because the dried consolidants remains porous. When the particles used are pigments, it is also conceivable to adjust the consolidant color. Moreover, a careful choice of particles should allow matching the thermal dilatation of the consolidant to that of the stone. An important limitation to further development of PMC has been the ability to avoid particle agglomeration in the dispersion. When agglomerates are present, not only do they increase the viscosity but they also can block pore entrances, preventing consolidant fromentering the stone. In this work we demonstrate the feasibility of adsorbing nano-silica particlesonto pigment particles to create a steric barrier to agglomeration. Rheology and density measurements confirm that the resulting dispersion is fluid and stable against settling. The consolidant readily penetrates Ohio Massilian sandstone, providing improved strength, stiffness, and salt resistance, compared to a commercial silicate consolidant.



Hide All
1.PROSOCO, 755 Minnesota Ave., P.O. Box 171677, Kansas City, KS 66117 USA
2. Félix, C., Peut-on consolider les grès tendres du Plateau suisse avec le silicate d'éthyle? (Can one consolidate the soft sandstones of the Swiss plateau with ethyl silicate?)”, pp. 267274 in Preservation and restoration of cultural heritage, ed. Pancella, R. Proc. LCP Congress, Montreux, 1995
3. Yang, M. Scherer, G.W. and Wheeler, G.S. pp. 201208 in Compatible Materials for the Protection of European Cultural Heritage, eds. Biscontin, G. Moropoulou, A. Erdik, M. Rodrigues, J. Delgado, PACT 56 (Tech. Chamber Greece, Athens, 1998)
4. Escalante, M.R. Valenza, J. and Scherer, G.W. pp. 459465 in Proc. 9th Int. Cong. Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Vol. 2, ed. Fassina, V. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000)
5. Escalante, M.R. Flatt, R. Scherer, G.W. Tsiourva, D. and Moropoulou, A.Particle-modified Consolidants”, Proc. Int. Symp. Conserv. Monuments Med. Basin V (2000), to be published
6. Grissom, C.A. and Weiss, N.R. Art and Archaeology Technical Abstracts 18 [1] (1981) 150202
7. Tsui, N. Flatt, R.J. and Scherer, G.W. “Crystallization damage by sodium sulfate”, to bepublished

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Rheology Optimization of Particle Modified Consolidants

  • Eleni Aggelakopoulou (a1), Pamela Charles (a1), Matilde E. Acerra (a1), Ana I. Garcia (a1), Robert J. Flatt (a1) and George W. Scherer (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.