Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:18:32.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reverse-annealing phenomenon during the high-temperature implantation of Ar+ into GaN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Igor O. Usov
Affiliation:
Curriculum in Applied and Materials Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3287, U.S.A.
Nalin R. Parikh
Affiliation:
Curriculum in Applied and Materials Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3287, U.S.A.
Darren Thomson
Affiliation:
Deptartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7919, U.S.A.
Robert F. Davis
Affiliation:
Deptartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7919, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A systematic investigation of the damage accumulation in GaN films induced by 150keV Ar ions as a function of implantation temperature and dose rate has been conducted. The depth distribution of the disorder in the Ga sublattice has been measured by RBS/channeling spectrometry with a glancing angle detector geometry to provide enhanced depth resolution. Two disordered regions were identified in the damage depth distribution: a near-surface peak and a bulk damage peak. These regions exhibit different behavior as a function of implantation temperature. The height of the near-surface peak, as expected, decreased with implantation temperature approaching the magnitude of the unimplanted sample. The displaced atomic density in the bulk damage peak also followed this tendency and decreased in the temperature range from room temperature to 500°C. The implantation at higher temperatures resulted in an increase in the amount of damage, reaching a maximum at about 700°C and displayed a characteristic “reverse annealing” behavior. Further increase of the implantation temperature to 1000oC reduced the disorder. The influence of the dose rate and implantation temperature on the radiation damage accumulation is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Papanicolau, N., Rao, M. V., Molnar, B., Tucker, J., Edwards, A., Holland, O. W. and Ridgway, M. C., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B148, 416 (1999).10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00880-5Google Scholar
2. Pearton, S. J., Zolper, J. C., Shul, R. J. and Ren, F., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 1 (1999).10.1063/1.371145Google Scholar
3. Kucheyev, S. O., Williams, J. S., Zou, J., Jagadish, C. and Li, G., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B178, 209 (2001).10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00459-6Google Scholar
4. Liu, C., Wenzel, A., Volz, K. and Rauschenbach, B., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B148, 369 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Parikh, N., Suvkhanov, A., Lioubtchenko, M., Carlson, E., Bremser, M., Bray, D., Davis, R. and Hunn, J., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B127/128, 463 (1997).10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00076-1Google Scholar
6. Wenzel, A., Liu, C., and Rauschenbach, B., Mat. Sci. Eng. B59, 191 (1999).10.1016/S0921-5107(98)00409-7Google Scholar
7. Feldman, L. C., Mayer, J. M. and Picraux, S. T., “Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling” (Academic Press 1982), pp.117135.10.1016/B978-0-12-252680-0.50012-7Google Scholar