Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:46:54.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Stresses in Bulk Metallic Glasses due to Differential Cooling or Thermal Tempering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E. Ustundag
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science, M/C 138-78, Pasadena, CA 91125, ustundag@hyperfine.caltech.edu
B. Clausen
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, LANSCE, MS H805, Los Alamos, NM 87545
J. C. Hanan
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science, M/C 138-78, Pasadena, CA 91125, ustundag@hyperfine.caltech.edu
M. A. M. Bourke
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, LANSCE, MS H805, Los Alamos, NM 87545
A. Winholtz
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, Research Park, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
A. Pekers
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science, M/C 138-78, Pasadena, CA 91125, ustundag@hyperfine.caltech.edu Amorphous Technologies, 27722 El Lazo, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Get access

Abstract

Due to their very low thermal conductivities and large thermal expansion values, bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) undergo differential cooling during processing. Large thermal gradients are generated across a specimen leading to residual stress buildup. A thin surface layer contains compressive stresses balanced by tension in the middle. Such stresses can not only influence the mechanical behavior of BMGs, but they can also lead to problems during manufacturing of large or intricate components. Analytical and finite element modeling was used to predict the values and distribution of such stresses as a function of processing conditions. Neutron diffraction measurements were then performed on model specimens which included crystalline phases as “strain gages”. It was shown that significant stresses, on the order of several hundred MPa, can be generated in BMGs. Modeling and diffraction results are presented and their implications discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Peker, A. and Johnson, W. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63, 2342 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Gilbert, C. J., Ritchie, R. O. and Johnson, W. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 71 (4), 476 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Bruck, H. A., Christman, T., Rosakis, A. J. and Johnson, W. L., Scripta Metall. 30, 429 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Bakke, E., Busch, R. and Johnson, W. L., AppL Phys. Lett., 67 (22), 3260 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Ohsaka, K., Chung, S. K., Rhim, W. K., Peker, A., Scruggs, D. and Johnson, W. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70 (6), 726 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Clausen, B., Üstündag, E., Hanan, J. C. and Bourke, M. A. M., in preparation (1998).Google Scholar
7. Clausen, B., Üstündag, E. and Bourke, M. A. M., in preparation (1998).Google Scholar
8. Gardon, R. in Glass Science and Technology, vol.5: Elasticity and Strength in Glasses, edited by Uhlmann, D. R. and Kreidl, N. J., pp. 146216, Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
9. Narayanaswamy, O. S. and Gardon, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 52 (10), 554 (1969).Google Scholar
10. Narayanaswamy, O. S. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 54 (10), 491 (1971).Google Scholar
11. Carre, H. and Daudeville, L., J. de Phys. IV, vol.6, 175, (1996).Google Scholar
12. Jong, M. de, Sietsma, J., Rekveldt, M. Th. and Beukel, A. van den, Mat. Sci. and Eng., A179–A180, 341 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Tejedor, M., Garcia, J. A., Carrizo, J. and Elbaile, L., J. Mater Sci., 32, 2337 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Bartholomew, R. F. and Garfinkel, H. M., in Glass Science and Technology, vol. 5: Elasticity and Strength in Glasses, edited by Uhlmann, D. R. and Kreidl, N. J., pp. 217270, Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
15. Bartenev, Z. M., Zh. Tekhn. Fiz., 19 (12), 1423 (1949).Google Scholar
16. Indenbom, V. L. and Vidro, L. I., Sov. Phys. Solid State, 6 (4), 767 (1964).Google Scholar
17. Yanniotis, S. and Kolokotsa, D., J. of Food Eng., 30 (3–4) 313 (1996).Google Scholar
18. ABAQUS Theory Manual, Hibbitt-Karlsson-Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI, 1995.Google Scholar