Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:39:48.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Stress in Pzt Thin Films and its Effect on Ferroelectric Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Terry J. Garino
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Mark Harrington
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The residual stress in solution derived Pb(Zr.53Ti.47)o3, PZT 53:47, films was determined by measuring the bending of the substrate due to the stress. The substrate consisted of an oxidized (100) silicon wafer with 300 nm coating of platinum. In all cases the stress was tensile. Films fired at a temperature in the range where pyrochlore formation occurs (500° to 575°C) had the highest residual stresses, 200 to 350 MPa, whereas those fired at higher temperatures, 600° to 650°C, where the perovskite phase forms had stresses of 100 to 200 MPa. Stress measurements made during film firing indicate that the pyrochlore containing films had higher residual stress because their coefficient of thermal expansion was much larger than that of predominantly perovskite films. The effect of the amount of stress on ferroelectric properties was studied by making measurements on a film with and without the application of an external stress. The external stress was applied by bending a circular section of the substrate, which effectively lowered the amount of tensile stress in the film by ∼30%. Decreasing the stress in this manner was found to increase the remanent polarization by ∼11% and the dielectric constant by ∼2%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Amin, A., Newnham, R.E. and Cross, L.E., Physical Review B 34 (3), 1595 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Stotz, S., Ferroelectrics 76, 123 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Krueger, H.H.A., J. Acoustical Soc. of Am. 42 (3), 636 (1967); 43 (3), 584 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Ivanova, T., Klyuskin, L. and Rudyak, V., Ferroelectrics 98, 59 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Krueger, H. and Berlincourt, D., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33 (10), 1339 (1961).Google Scholar
6. Yi, G., Wu, Z. and Sayer, M., J. Appl. Phys. 64 (5), 2717 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Tuttle, B., Schwartz, R., Doughty, D. and Voigt, J. in Ferroelectric Thin Films, edited by Meyers, E. R. and Kingon, A. I. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 200, Pittsburgh, PA 1990) pp. 159165.Google Scholar
8. Schwartz, R., Bunker, B., Dimos, D., Assink, R., Tuttle, B., Tallant, D., Weinstock, I. and Haaland, D. M., Proceedings of the 3rd International Symp. on Integrated Ferroelectrics, to be published in Ferroelectrics, 1991.Google Scholar
9. Stoney, G.G., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 82, 172 (1909).Google Scholar
10. Brantley, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 44 (1), 534 (1973).Google Scholar
11. EerNisse, E. and Derbenwick, G., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–23, 1534 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Gubanov, A.I. and Davydov, S., Soy. Phys.-Sol. State 14 (2), 372 (1972).Google Scholar
13. Timoshenko, S. and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., Theory of Plated and Shells. 2nd ed., (McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1959), pp. 396408.Google Scholar
14. Biswas, D.R., Chandratreya, S. and Pask, J.A., Bull. of the Am. Ceram. Soc. 58 (8), 792 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Touloukian, Y., Kirby, R., Taylor, R. and Lee, T., Thermophysical Properties of Matter. Vol. 13 Thermal Expansion of Nonmetallic Solids, (IFI/Plenum, New York, 1977). p. 154.Google Scholar
16. Buessem, W., Cross, L. and Goswami, A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 49 (1), 36 (1966).Google Scholar