Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:04:17.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Stress Effects on the Fracture of Tantalum Nitride Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. R. Moody
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551–0969
R. Q. Hwang
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551–0969
J. E. Angelo
Affiliation:
Seagate Technologies, Bloomington, MN 55420
S. Venkataraman
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Santa Clara, CA 95054
W. W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Get access

Abstract

In this study, continuous microscratch testing was used to determine the effects of compressive residual stresses on the fracture of thin tantalum nitride films. The films were sputter deposited at room temperature onto single crystal sapphire substrates to a thickness of 600 nm. Some films were left in the as-deposited condition while the remaining films were vacuum annealed at 300°C. The only discernible change in structure was a surface rearrangement of atoms into parallel arrays of striations on the vacuum annealed samples revealing a high compressive residual stress in the films. These stresses had a strong effect on fracture as shown by the as-deposited films which buckled readily during scratch tests forming uniform-width and circular blisters while the vacuum annealed films exhibited a much lower susceptibility to fracture. Application of mechanics-based models for film buckling defined the levels of compressive residual stress and their effect on interfacial fracture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mittal, K. L., Electrocomponent Science and Technology, 3, p. 21 (1976).Google Scholar
2. Au, C. L., Anderson, W. A., Schmitz, D. A., Flassayer, J. C., and Collins, F. M., J. Mater. Res., 5, p. 1224(1990).Google Scholar
3. Moody, N. R., Venkataraman, S. K., Nelson, J. C., Worobey, W., and Gerberich, W. W., in Polycrystalline Thin Films: Structure. Texture. Properties, and Applications, edited by Barmak, K., Parker, M. A., Floro, J. A., Sinclair, R., and Smith, D. A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 343, Pittsburgh, PA 1995) p. 603608.Google Scholar
4. Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res., 7, p. 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res., 1, p. 601 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Hutchinson, J. W. and Suo, Z., in Advances in Applied Mechanics, edited by Hutchinson, J. W. and Wu, T. Y. (Academic Press Inc., vol. 29, New York 1992) p. 63191.Google Scholar
7. Angelo, J. E., Moody, N. R., Venkataraman, S. K., and Gerberich, W. W., in Structure and Properties of Defects in Ceramics, edited by Bonell, D. A., Ruhle, M., and Chowdhry, U., eds., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 357, Pittsburgh, PA 1995) p. 603608.Google Scholar
8. Barensky, B., Private communication, Max-Planck Institut für Metallforschung, Stuttgart, Germany (1996).Google Scholar
9. Zhao, X.-A., Kolawa, E., and Nicolet, M.-A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A4, p. 3139 ((1986).Google Scholar
10. Grinfel'd, M. A., Sov. Phys. Doki., 31, p. 831 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Grilhe, J., Acta Metall. Mater., 41, p. 909 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Cardinale, D. F., Howitt, D. G., McCarty, K. F., Medlin, D. L., Mirkarimi, P. B., and Moody, N. R., Diamond and Related Materials, 5, p. 1295 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Messaoudi, K., Huntz, A. M., Lesage, B., Haut, C., and Lebrun, J. L., and Ji, V., to be published in Proceedings of the International Conference on Corrosion-Deformation Interactions, September 24–26, 1996, Nice, France.Google Scholar
14. Evans, A. G., Ruhle, M., Dalgleish, B. J., and Charalambides, P. G., in Metal-Ceramic Interfaces, edited by Ruhle, M., Evans, A. G., Ashby, M. F., and Hirth, J. P. (Pergammon Press, Oxford, 1990) p. 345364.Google Scholar