Skip to main content Accessibility help

Real-Time Monitoring of Indium Tin Oxide Laser Ablation in Liquid Crystal Display Patterning

  • M.H. Hong (a1), Y.F. Lu (a1), M. Meng (a1) and T.S. Low (a1)


Audible acoustic wave detection is applied to investigate KrF excimer laser ablation of Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) thin film layer for Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) patterning. It is found that there is no acoustic wave generation if laser fluence is lower than ITO ablation threshold. For laser fluence higher than the threshold, audible acoustic wave will be detected due to shock wave generation during ITO laser ablation. The amplitude of the acoustic wave is closely related to the laser ablation rate. With more laser pulse applied, the amplitude is dropped to zero because the ITO layer is completely removed. However, if laser fluence is increased higher than ablation threshold for glass substrate, the amplitude is also dropped with pulse number but not to zero. It is due to laser ablation of ITO layer and glass substrate at the same time. Since the thickness of ITO layer is in a scale of 100 nm, laser interaction with glass substrate will happen even at the first pulse of high laser fluence irradiation. Laser ablation induced ITO plasma emission spectrum in visible light region is analyzed by an Optical Multi-channel Analyzer (OMA). Specific spectral lines are In I (325.8, 410.2 and 451.1 nm) and In II 591.1 nm. Spectral intensities of 410.2 and 451.1 nm lines are selected to characterize the evolution of ITO plasma intensity with laser fluence and pulse number. It is found that the spectral intensities are reduced to zero with laser pulse number. It is also found that spectral lines other than ITO plasma will appear for laser fluence higher than ablation threshold for glass substrate. Threshold fluences for glass and ITO ablation are estimated for setting up a parameter window to control LCD patterning in real-time.



Hide All
1. Tahar, R.B.H., Ban, T., Ohya, Y., and Takahashi, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 2631 (1998).
2. Ow-Yang, C.W., Spinner, D., Shigesato, Y. and Paine, D.C., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 148 (1998).
3. Takai, M., Bollmann, D. and Haberger, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 2560 (1994).
4. Mohri, M., Kakinuma, H., Sakamoto, M., and Sawai, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, L1932 (1990).
5. Hoheisel, M., Mitwalsky, A., and Mrotzek, C., Phys. Status Solidi A 123, 461 (1991).
6. Knickerbocker, S.A. and Kulkarni, A.K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 757 (1996).
7. Szorenyi, T., Laude, L.D., Bertoti, I., Kantor, Z. and Geretovszky, Zs., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 6211 (1995).
8. Lu, Y.F., Hong, M.H., Chua, S.J., Teo, B.S., and Low, T.S., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 2186 (1996).
9. Lu, Y.F., Hong, M.H. and Aoyagi, Y. in Beam-Solid Interactions for Materials Synthesis and Characterization, edited by Jacobson, D.C., Luzzi, D.E., Heinz, T.F., and Iwaki, M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 354, Pittsburgh, PA 1995), p.483488.
10. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wavelength Tables, Edited by Harrison, G.R. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1969), p. xix.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed