Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:20:38.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Random Telegraph-like Signals in Ultrathin CMR Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

A. Lisauskas
Affiliation:
Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN
S. I. Khartsev
Affiliation:
Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN
A. M. Grishin
Affiliation:
Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to study low frequency (10 Hz - 10 kHz) noise in low dimensional colossal magnetoresistors (epitaxial CMR films). Two contributions in electrical fluctuations were observed: thermal noise, which depends on resistance and temperature, and excess part, which is determined by resistance fluctuations and are mostly related to film microstructure. For films, thicker than the critical thickness, excess noise spectra has 1/fα dependence with α = 1 ± 0.2. In films thinner than the critical one there are random telegraph like signals (TLS) with Lorentzian spectra appear on the background of 1/f noise. Noise spectroscopy reveals the relaxation process in 4.2 nm thick film has thermally activated character with an energy gap of 20 meV at temperatures below 156 K and 78 meV at T > 156 K.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lisauskas, A., Khartsev, S.I., Grishin, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 756 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Balcells, LL., Enrich, R., Calleja, A., Fontcuberta, J., and Obradors, X., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4298 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Lisauskas, A., Bäck, J., Khartsev, S. I., Grishin, A.M., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 6961 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Khartsev, S. I., Johnsson, P., and Grishin, A. M., J. Appl.Phys. 87, 2394 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Rajeswari, M., Shreekala, R., Goyal, A., Lofland, S. E., Bhagat, S. M, Ghosh, K., Sharma, R. P., Greene, R. L., Ramesh, R., Venkatesan, T., and Boettcher, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2672 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Sun, J. Z., Abraham, D. W., Rao, R. A., and Eom, C. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3017 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Alers, G. B., Ramirez, A. P., and Jin, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3644 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Scouten, S., Xu, Y., Moeckly, B. H., and Buhrman, R., Phys. Rev. B 50, 16121 (1994).Google Scholar