Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:36:36.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radionuclide Uptake and Transport on Microbes in Potential Repository Drifts at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Darren M. Jolley
Darren M. Jolley*
Affiliation:
Engineered Barrier System Department Duke Engineering and Services 1180 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Get access

Abstract

Radionuclide adsorption onto microbes, microbial retention in the engineered barrier system (EBS), and their potential release from the EBS as microbial colloids have been investigated. The microbial source term for these calculations was derived using MING V 1.0 software code [1]. Multiple model calculations from MING representing variations in possible microbial communities in the EBS were abstracted into two equations representing one meter segments of potential repository drift containing either commercial spent nuclear fuel (CSNF) or defense high level waste (HLW) packages. These two equations (Equations 1 and 2) represent the average cumulative microbial biomass generated in the EBS at any given time. A distribution for uranium uptake onto microbes (162.88 ± 133.05 mg U/gm dry cell) was applied to the microbial source term. The distribution was derived from the data set in Suzuki and Banfield [2] representing 45 different species of bacteria and fungus, covering uranium uptake at optimum pH values of 1 to 7. The mass of uranium sorbed onto the biomass was either sequestered in the EBS or transported as a microbial colloid based on a regression of data from Jewett et al. [3] representing microbial sorption onto air-water interfaces in unsaturated column experiments. Over one million years, it is estimated that EBS microbes may adsorb from 77 to 2302 kg of uranium [2302 kg U > 100% of the uranium available in a one meter segment of a CSNF waste package] per meter of waste package depending on the saturation of the invert and type of waste package. Over the same time, microbial colloids may transport from 8 to 1250 kg of adsorbed uranium per meter of waste package from the EBS.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ10.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ehrhorn, T. F. and Jolley, D. M.; MING Microbial Impacts to the Near-Field Environment Geochemistry Version 1.0, CSCI: 3018 V1.0, CRWMS M&O, Las Vegas, Nevada: 1998 p. 90.Google Scholar
2. Suzuki, Y. and Banfield, J.F.; in Uranium: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and the Environment, edited by Burns, P.C. and Finch, R., (Mineralogical Society of America Washington D.C. 1999) pp. 393–432.Google Scholar
3. Jewett, D.G.; Logan, B.E.; Arnold, R.G.; and Bales, R.C.; J. Cont. Hyd. 36,73 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Hersman, L.; Microbial Effects on Colloidal Agglomeration. LA-12972-MS. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 1995. p.17.Google Scholar
5. Hersman, L.E.; in The Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface. edited by Amy, P.S. and Haldeman, D.L., eds. (CRC Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida, 1997) pp. 299–323.Google Scholar
6. Mills, A.L.; in The Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface. edited by Amy, P.S. and Haldeman, D.L., eds. (CRC Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida, 1997) pp. 225–246.Google Scholar
7. Abdelouas, A. Lu, Y. Lutze, W. and Nuttall, H. E.; J. Cont. Hydro. 35, 217 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Fredrickson, J. K, Zachara, J. M. Kennedy, D. W. Duff, M. C. Gorby, Y. A. Li, S. W. and Krupka, K. M.; Geoch. Cosmo. Acta, 64, 3085 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Amy, P.S. 1997.; in The Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface. Amy, P.S. and Haldeman, D.L., eds. (CRC Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, Florida) pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
10 Haldeman, D.L. and Amy, P.S. Microb. Ecol., 25, 185 (1993).Google Scholar
11. U.S. Department of Energy, Yucca Mountain Science and Engineering Report Technical Information Supporting Site Recommendation Consideration DOE/RW-0539, office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, North Las Vegas, Nevada (2001).Google Scholar
12. Wan, J.; Wilson, J.L.; and Kieft, T.L.; Appl. Enviro. Microbio. 60, 509 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Jolley, D. M.; Microbial Transport Sensitivity Calculations. CAL-EBS-PA-000011 REV 00 ICN 01, Bechtel SAIC Company, Las Vegas, Nevada (2001) p. 23.Google Scholar
14. Chen, C.-I.; Meike, A.; Chuu, Y.-J.; Sawvel, A.; and Lin, W.; in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII. edited by Wronkiewicz, D.J. and Lee, J.H., (Materials Research Society, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1999) pp. 1151–1158.Google Scholar
15. Jolley, D. M; In-Drift Microbial Communities. ANL-EBS-MD-000038 REV 00 ICN 01. CRWMS M&O. Las Vegas, Nevada: (2000) p. 174.Google Scholar
16. Jolley, D. M., Ehrhorn, T. and Horn, J. J. Cont. Hyd. In Prep., (2002).Google Scholar
17. McKinley, I.G.; Hagenlocher, I.; Alexander, W.R.; and Schwyn, B.; FEMS Micro. Rev. 20, 545 (1997).Google Scholar
18. Daughney, C.J.; Fein, J.B.; and Yee, N.; Chem. Geo. 144, 161 (1998).Google Scholar
19. Fein, J.B.; Daughney, C.J.; Yee, N.; and Davis, T.A.; Geoch. Cosmo. Acta, 61, 3319 (1997).Google Scholar