Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T04:50:48.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiation Effects in Radwaste Glasses : A Reappraisal of Alpha-Recoil Aging as Simulated by Ion Implantation.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J.C. Dran
Affiliation:
Laboratoire René Bernas, B.P. 1, 91406 Orsay, France.
Y. Langevin
Affiliation:
Laboratoire René Bernas, B.P. 1, 91406 Orsay, France.
M. Maurette
Affiliation:
Laboratoire René Bernas, B.P. 1, 91406 Orsay, France.
J.C. Petit
Affiliation:
Laboratoire René Bernas, B.P. 1, 91406 Orsay, France.
Get access

Abstract

New results on the etchability of lead implanted silicate glasses are presented which are satisfactorily accounted for by a Monte Carlo Model of etching. These results strongly support the radiation damage origin of the ion-induced modification of the chemical reactivity of glass. Major artefacts of ion implantation are then discarded as possible causes of the observed effects and consequently this technique is shown to be a valuable tool for the study of α-recoil aging in H.L.W. glasses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dran, J.C., Langevin, Y., Maurette, M., Petit, J.C. in : Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 2, Northrup, C.J.M. Jr. ed. (Plenum press, New York 1980) pp 135140.Google Scholar
2. Dran, J. C., Maurette, M., Petit, J.C., Science 209, 1518 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Dran, J.C., Maurette, M., Petit, J.C., Vassent, B. in ; Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management Vol. 3, Moore, J.G. ed. (Plenum Press, New York 1981) pp. 449456.Google Scholar
4. Weber, W.J., Turcotte, R.P., Bunnell, L.R., Roberts, F.P. and Westsik, J.M. Jr. in Ceramic in Nuclear Waste Management, Chikalla, I.D. and Mendel, J.E. ed. (Techn. Inf. Center U.S. Dept. Energy 1979) pp 294299.Google Scholar
5. Huang, W.H. and Walker, R.M., Science 155, 1103 (1967).Google Scholar
6. Dran, J.C., Langevin, Y., Maurette, M., Petit, J.C., Vassent, B., Nucl. Instr. Meth. 182/183, 741 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Borg, J., Dran, J.C., Langevin, Y., Maurette, M., Petit, J.C., Rad. Effects (1981) (in press).Google Scholar
8. Burns, W.G., Hugues, A.E., Marples, J.A.C., Nelson, R.S., Stonchan, A.M., AERE report R 10189 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Holland, H.D. and Gottfried, D., Acta Cryst. 8, 291 (1955).Google Scholar
10. Wasilewski, P.J., Senftle, F.E., Vaz, J.E., Rad. Effects 17, 191 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Ringwood, A.E., Oversby, V.M., Sinclair, W. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management Vol. 2, Northrup, C.J.M. Jr. ed. (Plenum, New York 1980) pp. 273280.Google Scholar
12. Arnold, G.W. and Whan, R.E., Rad. Effects 7, 109 (1971)Google Scholar
13. Bonniaud, R. : Personnal communication.Google Scholar
14. Kushner, R.A., McCaughan, D.V., Murphy, V.I., Heilig, J.A., Phys. Rev. B 10, 2632 (1974).Google Scholar
15. Bonniaud, R. : Personnal communication.Google Scholar