Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:35:43.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Pulsed EDMR Study of Charge Trapping at Pb Centers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Christoph Boehme
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin, Abteilung Siliziumphotovoltaik, Kekuléstr. 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany
Felice Friedrich
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin, Abteilung Siliziumphotovoltaik, Kekuléstr. 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany
Klaus Lips
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin, Abteilung Siliziumphotovoltaik, Kekuléstr. 5, 12489 Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Low temperature pulsed electrically detected magnetic resonance (pEDMR) measurements of charge trapping and recombination transitions involving Pb centers at the c-Si (111)/SiO2 interface are presented. The results of these experiments show that when a conduction electron is trapped, it forms a strongly coupled spin pair with the defect electron prior to its readjustment into the charged Pb ground state. The data reveals that the Landé factors of the two electrons within these pairs are almost identical (difference < 0.002) and that they are, within the measurement accuracy, identical to the Landé factor of the uncharged, singly occupied Pb center. From this, it is concluded that trapping and recombination at Pb defects is dominated by direct charge capture and not by tunneling or hopping transitions from other localized states. Different cross sections attributed in previous studies to different interface defects at the c-Si/SiO2 interface can be explained by readjustment out of different spin configurations of the charged Pb-* defect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shockely, W., Read, W. T. Jr, Phys. Rev. 57 (5), 835 (1952).Google Scholar
2 Brower, K. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 1111 (1983).Google Scholar
3 Cook, M. and White, C. T., Phys. Rev. B 38, 9674 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Albohn, J., Füssel, W., Sinh, N. D., Kliefoth, K., and Fuhs, W., J. Appl. Phys. 88, 842 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Rong, F. C., Buchwald, W. R., Poindexter, E. H., Warren, W. L., and Keeble, D. J., Solid State Electron. 34, 835 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Boehme, C. and Lips, K., Phys. Status Solidi C 1, 1255 (2004).Google Scholar
7 Spaeth, J. M., Overhof, H., Point Defects in Semiconductors and Insulators, Springer Verlag Berlin (2003).Google Scholar
8 Lenahan, P. M. and Conley, J. F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 2134 (1998).Google Scholar
9 Nishi, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 10, 52 (1971).Google Scholar
10 Boehme, C. and Lips, K., Phys. Rev. B, 68 (24), 245105 (2003).Google Scholar
11 Boehme, C. and Lips, K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 91 (24), 246603 (2003).Google Scholar
12 Boehme, C. and Lips, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4363 (2001).Google Scholar
13 Böhme, C., The dynamics of spin-dependent charge carrier recombination, Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen (2003).Google Scholar
14 Friedrich, F., Boehme, C. and Lips, K., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 056101 (2005).Google Scholar