Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T22:37:03.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PROGRESS ON SCINTILLATOR RESEARCH BY THE CRYSTAL CLEAR COLLABORATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Paul Lecoq*
Affiliation:
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

A large effort has been undertaken since nearly 2 years by 14 research institutes (the “Crystal Clear” collaboration, CERN RD project 18), in order to develop and investigate new dense, radiation hard and fast inorganic scintillators suitable for very good resolution electromagnetic calorimeters to be built at the new high luminosity accelerators. Other fields of interest like nuclear physics, gamma ray astronomy, medical imaging (PET), safety systems and non destructive industrial applications are also rapidly growing. Progress on cerium fluoride will be reviewed with some comments about mass scale production and cost considerations. The pro's and con's of potentially cheaper solutions based on fluoride glasses or lead compounds will be discussed. Finally some attractive candidates will be mentioned for low energy gamma ray applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] R&D Proposal for the study of new fast and radiation hard scintillators for calorimetry at LHC Crystal Clear Collaboration, CERN / DRDC P27 / 91-15, project RD-18 and Memorandum of Understanding RD-18Google Scholar
[2] Moses, W.W. and Derenzo, S. E., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., NS–36 (1989) 173 10.1109/23.34428Google Scholar
[3] Anderson, D.F., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–36 (1989) 137, NIM A287 (1990) 606Google Scholar
[4] Further results on Cerium Fluoride crystals, Crystal Clear collaboration, CERN-PPE/93-23, NIM A332 (1993) 373Google Scholar
[5] Pedrini, C. et al. , J. of Phys. Cond. Matter, 4,5461 (1992) M. Nikl et al, Sol. St. Comm. 87, n°3,185 (1993)and 90, 155 (1994)Google Scholar
[6] Chipaux, R. et al, CE Saclay internal report DAPNIA/94/01Google Scholar
[7] Anderson, D.F. et al, FERMILAB-PUB-93-244Google Scholar
[8] Derenzo, S.E. et al. , IEEE trans. Nucl. Sci., NS–37, N 2 (1990), p203 M. Kobayashi et al, KEK preprint 92-187, and Proceedings of Crystal 2000, Chamonix, France, Sept. 1992, p3 75 L.L. Nagornaya et al, Proceedings of Crystal 2000, Chamonix, France, Sept. 1992, p 367 V. Katchanov, J.P. Peigneux, private communication10.1109/23.106619Google Scholar
[9] Hobson, P.R., Proceedings of Crystal 2000, Chamonix, France, Sept. 1992, p343 E.G. Devitsin et al, Proceedings of Crystal 2000, Chamonix, France, Sept. 1992, p401Google Scholar
[10] Kobayashi, M. et al. , KEK preprints 90-133 and 91-1 P. Lecoq et al, NIM A315 (1992), 337 P. Lecoq, IEEE trans. Nucl. Sci., NS-40, N 4 (1993), p409Google Scholar
[11] Melcher, C.L. et al. , NIM A314 (1992), 212 C.L. Melcher, Proceedings of Crystal 2000, Chamonix, France, Sept. 1992, p415Google Scholar
[12] Notaristefani, F. De, Pani, R., private communicationGoogle Scholar
[13] Mares, J.A. et al. , Chem. Physics Lett. 206, number 1,2,3,4, p9 J.A. Mares, Crystal Clear report, March 199410.1016/0009-2614(93)85508-LGoogle Scholar