Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:24:58.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Product Consistency Leach Tests of Savannah River Site Radioactive Waste Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Ned E. Bibler  and
John K. Bates
Ned E. Bibler
Affiliation:
Savannah River Laboratory, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC, 29802
John K. Bates
Affiliation:
Argonne, National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL, 60439
Get access

Abstract

The Product Consistency Test (PCT) is a glass leach test developed at the Savannah River Site (SRS) to confirm the durability of radioactive nuclear waste glasses that will be produced in the Defense Waste Processing Facility. The PCT is a seven day, crushed glass leach test in deionized water at 90°C. Final leachates are filtered and acidified prior to analysis. To demonstrate the reproducibility of the PCT when performed remotely, SRS and Argonne National Laboratory have performed the PCT on samples of two radioactive glasses. The tests were also performed to compare the releases of the radionuclides with the major nonradioactive glass components and to determine if radiation from the glass was affecting the results of the PCT.

The test was performed in triplicate at each laboratory. For the major soluble elements, B, Li, Na, and Si, in the glass, each investigator obtained relative precisions in the range 2–5% in the triplicate tests. This range indicates good precision for the PCT when performed remotely with master slave manipulators in a shielded cell environment. When the results of the two laboratories were compared to each other, the agreement was within 20%. Normalized concentrations for the nonradioactive and radioactive elements in the PCT leachates measured at both facilities indicated that the radionuclides were released from the glass slower than the major soluble elements in the glass. For both laboratories, the normalized releases for both glasses were in the general order Li∼B∼Na>Si>Cs-137>Sb-125>Sr-90. The normalized releases for the major soluble elements and the final pH values in the tests with radioactive glass are consistent with those for nonradioactive glasses with similar compositions. This indicates that there was no significant effect of radiation on the results of the PCT.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 327
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jantzen, C. M. and Bibler, N. E., DPST-87-575, Savannah River Laboratory, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Aiken, SC (1987).Google Scholar
2. Jantzen, C. M. and Bibler, N. E., “Product Consistency Test (PCT) for DWPF Glass: Test Optimization and Protocol,” USDOE Report, To be published (1990).Google Scholar
3.U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, USDOE Report DOE/RW-0125 OGR/B-8 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Applewhite, A. L. and Plodinec, M. J., Waste Management '89, Vol. I, Post, R. G., Ed., pp 723–728, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, (1989).Google Scholar
5. Bibler, N. E. and Jantzen, C. M., Waste Management '89, Vol. i, Post, R. G., Ed., pp 743–749, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, (1989).Google Scholar
6. Piepel, G. F., Jones, T. E., Egget, D. L., and Mellinger, G. B., USDOE Report PNL-6967, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA (1989).Google Scholar
7. Bibler, N. E., Advances in Ceramics. 20, Clark, D.E., White, W.B. and Machiels, A.J. (Eds.), The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, pp. 619–626 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Bibler, N. E., Wicks, G. G., and Oversby, V. M., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, VIII, Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C. (Eds.), p. 247, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, (1984).Google Scholar
9. Baxter, R. G., USDOE Report DP-1606. Rev.2, Savannah River Laboratory, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc., Aiken, SC (1988).Google Scholar
10. Abrajano, T. A., Bates, J. K., Ebert, W., and Gerding, T. J., Advances in Ceramics. 20. Clark, D.E., White, W.B. and Machiels, A.J.(eds.), 609–618, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, (1986).Google Scholar
11. Bates, J. K., Lam, D. J., and Steindler, M. J., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. VI. Brookins, D. G. (ed.), pp. 183–188 Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, (1983).Google Scholar
12. Abrajano, T. A. and Bates, J. K., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management. X. Bates, J. K. and Seefeldt, W. B. (ed.), pp. 533–546, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, (1987).Google Scholar
13. Jantzen, C.M. and Plodinec, M.J., J. Non-Crystalline Solids. 67. 207–233 (1984).Google Scholar