Skip to main content Accessibility help

Pressure Assisted Crystallization of MnAl Thin Films

  • Gregory A. Fischer (a1), M. Lea Rudee (a1), Vitali F. Nesterenko (a2) and Sastry Indrakanti (a2)


The effect of hot isostatic pressure processing (HIP) on MnAl films has been compared to vacuum annealing for the purpose of obtaining substantial amounts of tau phase MnAl in films under 200 nm. Films were deposited by dc sputtering from both MnAlNiC an MnAl targets. As-deposited films were nearly amorphous. Post deposition annealing in vacuum produced only small amounts of the ferromagnetic tau-phase in films thinner than 200 nm.

In all instances, regardless of substrate and sputtering target, the use of HIP in place of vacuum annealing increased the degree of crystallinity of the samples when compared to those annealed in vacuum. For the 100 nm samples deposited from the MnAlNiC target, these changes in crystallinity were accompanied by changes in the M-H loops of the samples. MnAlNiC HIP samples had improved magnetic properties compared to those of equal thickness annealed in vacuum. The 100 nm HIP sample sputtered from the MnAl target also showed an increase in moment, though the changes were not as dramatic as those seen in the samples sputtered from the MnAlNiC target.

The 50 nm films from both targets also showed a change in crystallinity when compared to vacuum annealed samples. These films, unlike the 100 nm films, had ferromagnetic properties that were no better than those of the vacuum annealed samples. This suggests that while the 2 kbar of pressure used in this study assists in the formation of tau-phase in 100 nm films, the appropriate pressure for forming tau-phase in 50 nm films is yet to be determined.



Hide All
1. Cheeks, T. L., Brasil, M. J. S. P., Sands, T., Harbison, J. P., Aspnes, D. E., Keramidas, V. G., and , S. J. A. Jr, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 1393 (1992).
2. Csanady, A., Urban, K., Mayer, J., and Barna, P., J. Vac. Sci. & Tech. A 5, 1733 (1987).
3. Morisako, A., Matsumoto, M., and Naoe, M., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 4281 (1987).
4. Sands, T., Harbison, J. P., Leadbeater, M. L., , S. J. A. Jr, Hull, G. W., Ramesh, R., and Keramidaser, V. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2609 (1990).
5. Takeuchi, T., Hirayama, Y., Futamoto, M., Takagi, K., and Fujiwara, T., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 28, L1230 (1989).
6. Takeuchi, T., Hirayama, Y., and Futamoto, M., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 4465 (1990).
7. Barna, P. B., Csanady, A., Timmer, U., and Urban, K., J. Mat. Res. 7, 1115 (1992).
8. Huang, J. H., Kuo, P. C., and Shen, S. C., IEEE Trans. Magn., 31, 2494 (1995).
9. Kuo, P. C., Yao, Y. D., Huang, J. H., Shen, S. C., and Jou, J. H., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5621 (1997).
10. Kuo, P. C., Ker, K. J., Yao, Y. D., and Huang, J. H., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4892 (1999).
11. Fischer, G. A. and Rudee, M. L., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 213, 335 (2000).
12. Lu, G. Q., Nygren, E., and Aziz, M. J., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 5323 (1991).


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed