Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:44:03.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation of Ge (100) Substrates for High-Quality Epitaxial Growth of Group IV Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mark Nowakowski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
Jordana Bandaru
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
L.D. Bell
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
Shouleh Nikzad
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125, USA
Get access

Abstract

We compare various wet chemical treatments, in preparing high-quality Ge (100) surfaces suitable for molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Various surface treatments are explored such as UV-ozone treatment followed by exposure to chemical solutions such as de-ionized (DI) water, hydrofluoric acid (HF), or hydrochloric acid (HCl). Chemical treatments to remove the oxide are performed in a nitrogen environment to prevent further formation of surface oxide prior to surface analysis. Following chemical treatments, in situ reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) analysis is performed to observe the surface evolution as a function of temperature. In a separate chamber, we analyze each sample, before and after chemical treatment by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to directly determine the oxide desorption following each chemical treatment. Our results of this comparative study, the effectiveness of each chemical treatment, and the stability of the passivated surface suggest that UV ozone cleaning, followed by 10% HCl is the best choice for removing most of the oxide. Furthermore, we present evidence of high quality epitaxial growth of SnxGe1−x on wafers prepared by our method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ragan, R., Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2002.Google Scholar
2. He, G., Atwater, H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(10), 1937 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Tabet, N. et al., Surf. Sci. 523, 6872 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Shiraki, A., Ishizaka, Y., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 666 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Akane, T. et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 108, 303305 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Lu, Z.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 4 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Prabhakarana, K. et al., Surf. Sci. 316, L1031–L1033 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Webb, L.J., Lewis, N.S. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 54045412 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Prabhakaran, K., Ogino, T., Surf. Sci. 325, 263271 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Bodlaki, D., Yamamoto, H., Waldeck, D., Borguet, E., Surf. Sci. 543, 6374 (2003).Google Scholar