Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:39:29.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Power Generation Efficiency with Extremely Large Z factor Thermoelectric Material

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2011

Kazuaki Yazawa
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A.
Ali Shakouri
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A recently developed generic model of a thermoelectric power generation system suggests a promising future for cost effective and scalable power generation. The model is based on co-optimizing the thermoelectric module together with the heat sink. Using this model, efficiency at maximum output power is calculated. It is shown that this approaches the Curzon-Ahlborn limit at very large Z values which is consistent with thermodynamic systems with irreversible heat engines. However, this happens only when the thermal resistances of the thermoelectric device with hot and cold heat sinks exactly match. For asymmetrical thermal resistances, the efficiency at maximum output power is different. This is consistent with the very recent results for the thermodynamic engines. Finally, we study the impact of lowering the thermal conductivity of the thermoelectric material or increasing its power factor and how these affect the performance of the thermoelectric power generation system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rosi, F.D., Hockings, E.F. and Lindenblad, N.E., RCA Review 22, 82–121, (1961)Google Scholar
2. Vineis, C.J., Shakouri, A., Majumdar, A., Kanatzidis, M.G., Adv. Mater. 22(36):3970–80 (2010)Google Scholar
3. Dresselhaus, M.S., Chen, G., Tang, M.Y., Ronggui, L., Lee, H., Wang, D., Ren, Z., Fleurial, J. and Gogna, P., Advanced Materials 19-8, 1043–1053, (2007)Google Scholar
4. Yazawa, K. and Shakouri, A., Proc. IMECE2010, ASME, (2010).Google Scholar
5. Mayer, P.M. and Ram, R.J., Nanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering 10: 143–155, (2006)Google Scholar
6. Stevens, J.W., Energy Conversion and Management 42, 709–720, (2001)Google Scholar
7. Snyder, G.J., Energy Harvesting Technologies, Ed. Priya, S. et al. ., 330–331, (2009)Google Scholar
8. Esposito, M., Lindenberg, K. and Van DenBroeck, C., EPL Journal 85, 60010, (2009)Google Scholar
9. Curzon, F. and Ahlborn, B., Am. J. Phys. 43, 22, (1975)Google Scholar
10. Esposito, M., Kawai, R., Lindenberg, K. and VanDenBroeck, C., PRL 105, 150603 (2010)Google Scholar