Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:20:30.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polymer/metal Interfaces in Interconnect Structures: Moisture Diffusion and Stress Corrosion Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Qing Ma ,
Quan Tran ,
Chuanbin Pan ,
Harry Fujimoto  and
Chien Chiang
Qing Ma
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Quan Tran
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Chuanbin Pan
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Harry Fujimoto
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Chien Chiang
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA 95052
Get access

Abstract

Moisture can cause a host of reliability problems at interfaces including interface debonding. Two mechanisms can be identified. First, moisture at an interface can reduce the interface bonding strength dramatically by altering the chemical bonds. Second, when an interface with a crack or a crack-like defect is under tensile stresses, stress corrosion may allow crack growth at stresses much lower than critical fracture would require. To avoid wet interfaces, wafers should be briefly baked or exposed to a plasma in situ before the next film deposition step. However, moisture can also reach interfaces by diffusion along interfaces from unprotected edges during a wet process, such as CMP, or during storage in the ambient. In this work, the effect of moisture induced interface strength reduction was utilized to determine the diffusion distance. By using a mechanical peel technique, the diffusivity of moisture along the interface between Al and a poly(arylene ether) based low-K material (PAE2) was measured to be 4–6 μm2/s. Stress corrosion was studied using a special 4-point bend technique so that both strain energy release rate and crack velocity can be obtained. It was found that the mechanism of stress corrosion at this interface is more complicated compared to that in a bulk material: while the chemical reaction took place at the crack tip, moisture diffusion was also occurring along the interface ahead of the crack tip, preconditioning the interface. There appeared to be a region that kinetics was limited by interfacial moisture diffusion and reaction, from which the reaction time for interface weakening was estimated to be ∼ 10 seconds. It was also found that even for samples saturated with moisture, the relative humidity of the test environment was still very important.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 511: Symposium E – Low Dielectric Constant Materials IV , 1998 , 329
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hutchinson, J.W. and Suo, Z., “Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials,” Adv. Appl. Mech., 29, 63–191, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Ma, Qing, Bumgarner, John, Fujimoto, Harry, Lane, Michael, and Dauskardt, Reinhold, “Adhesion Measurement of Interfaces in Multilayer Interconnect Structures,” in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics VII, MRS Proceedings, Vol. 473, 1997.Google Scholar
3. Dauskardt, Reinhold, Lane, Michael and Ma, Qing, “Adhesion and debonding of multi-layer thin film structures,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, in printing.Google Scholar
4. Xu, G., Ragan, D.D., Clarke, R.R., He, M., Ma, Q., and Fujimoto, H., “Measurement of the Fracture Energy of SiO2/TiN Interfaces Using the Residually-Stresses Thin-Film Micro-Strip Test,” MRS Symposium Proceedings, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Jain, V., Adibi-Rizi, F., Moghadam, F. and Dauskardt, R.H., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V, edited by Oates, A.S., Filter, W.F., Rosenberg, R., Greer, A.L. and Gadepally, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 391, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
6. weiderhorn, S.M., J. Amer. Cera. Soc., 59, 407, 1967.Google Scholar
7. Denton, D.D., Day, D.R., Priore, D.F. and Senturia, S.D., “Moisture diffusion in polyimide films in IC,” J. Electronic Materials, Vol. 14, 1985.Google Scholar
8. Mclnerney, E.J. and Flinn, P.A., “Diffusivity of Moisture in thin films,” IEEE Proceddings, 1982.Google Scholar
9. Cox, J.N. and Hwang, K., “The spatial resolution of water diffusion and trapping in silicateglass thin filns by micro-FTIR and neutron depth profiling,” ECS Proceedings, Vol. 93–2, CVD-XII, 1993.Google Scholar
10. Sutton, and Balluffi, , Interfaces in Crystalline Materials, Oxford Science Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
11. Ma, Q., Pan, C., Fujimoto, H., Triplett, B., Coon, P. and Chiang, C., Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J. and Baker, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996) pp. 379–384.Google Scholar
12. Ma, Q., “A Four-Point Bending Technique for Studying Subcritical Crack Growth in Thin Films and at Interfaces,” J. Materials Research, 12, 840–845, 1997.Google Scholar
13. Charalambides, P.G., Lund, J., Evans, A.G. and McMeeking, R.M., “A Test Specimen for Determining the Fracture Resistance of Bimaterial Interfaces,” J. Appl. Mech., 111, 77–82, 1989.Google Scholar
14. Hillig, W.B. and Charles, R.J., High Strength Materials (Edited by Zackay, V.F.), p.682, John Wiley, New York, 1964.Google Scholar