Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:24:41.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical-Chemical Considerations for Semiconductor Room-Temperature Radiation Detectors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Schieber ,
H. Hermon  and
M. Roth
M. Schieber
Affiliation:
School of Applied Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904, Israel
H. Hermon
Affiliation:
School of Applied Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904, Israel
M. Roth
Affiliation:
School of Applied Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Physical properties of large band gap semiconductors such as: HgI2, CdTe, Cd0.8Zn0.2Te, CdSe, Cd0.7Zn0.3Se, GaAs, PbI2 and TlBr are briefly reviewed and discussed in terms of their use as room temperature operating x-ray and gamma ray radiation detectors. It is shown that HgI2 which has the largest drift length for holes, λ=μτE i.e., the product of the mobility μh, life time τh and the electrical field E, is at present the leading material, being followed by the newly developed Cd0.8Zn0.2Te. Chemical defects in HgI2 were enhanced by doping the material with aliphatic, aromatic and oxyhydrocarbons as well as with excess Hg and I2 and the increase in unit cell parameter was studied as a function of the amount of dopant. The value of τ was measured as a function of dopant concentration and it was found that Hg doping causes the most severe trapping defects. Low temperature studies of τh down to 170K allowed the identification of the trapping energy levels and concentration of electrically active defects. Shallow traps of 0.13-0.18 eV stemming from deviation from stoichiometry of H-gI2 were found to be in the ppm level whereas deeper traps of 0.4-0.5 eV stemming from hydrocarbons were found to be in the ppb level. It is concluded that only extensive research on the physical, chemical and structural defects correlated with improved crystal growth and device fabrication methods, would lead, in the future, to improvements in λh also of the other large Eg semiconductor detector materials.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 302: Symposium F – Semiconductors for Room-Temperature Radiation Detector Applications , 1993 , 347
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Whited, R.C. and Schieber, M., Nucl Instr. and Meth. 162, 113 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Schieber, M., Roth, M. and Schnepple, W.F., J. of Cryst. Growth 65, 353 (1983).Google Scholar
3. See procceedings of 7th Int. Workshop on Room Temperature Semiconductors X and Gamma Ray Detectors, Ravelo, Italy, 1991 Edited by Dusi, W., Perillo, E. and Siffert, P., published in Nucl Instru. and Meth. Vol A322, (1992).Google Scholar
4. Armantrout, G., Swierkovski, S., Sherohman, J. and Yee, J., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–24, 121 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Yee, J., Sherohman, J. and Armantrout, G., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–23, 117 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Sakai, Eiji, Nucl Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res., 196, 121 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Cizin, M., Nucl Instr. and Meth. A253, 407 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Hecht, H.K., Z. Phys.,77, 235 (1932).Google Scholar
9. Zanio, K., in Semiconductors and Semimetals Series - Cadmium Telluride,Vol 113, (Academic Press, 1978).Google Scholar
10. Doty, F.P., Butler, J.F., Lingren, C.L., Schetzina, J.F. and Bowers, K.A., J. Vac. Sci. Techn., B10, 1418 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Roth, M., Nucl Instru. and Meth. A283, 29 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Burger, A., Roth, M., Schieber, M., IEEE Trans. Nuci. Sci. NS–32, 556 (1988).Google Scholar
13. McGregor, D. S., Knoll, G. F., Eisn, Y. and Brake, R., Nucl Instr. and Meth. A322, 487 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Shan, R.S., Lund, J.C., Olschner, F., Moy, P.L. and Squillante, M.R., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–36, 199 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Lund, J.C., Shan, R.S., Squillante, M.R., Moy, P.L., Sinclair, F. and Entine, G., Nucl. Instr. Meth., A283, 299 (1989).Google Scholar
16. Hermon, H., Roth, M. and Schieber, M., J. Cryst. Growth, 106, 68 (1990).Google Scholar
17. Hermon, H., Roth, M., Nissenbaum, J., Schieber, M. and Shamir, J., J. Cryst. Growth 109, 376 (1991).Google Scholar
18. Hermon, H., Schieber, M., Roth, M. and Shamir, J., Analytica Chimica Acta, 259, 181 (1992).Google Scholar
19. Hermon, H., Roth, M. and Schieber, M. and Shamir, J., Vibrational Spectroscopy (ELSEVIER), 2, 155 (1991).Google Scholar
20. Hermon, H., Roth, M. and Schieber, M., Proc. Room Temperature Semicon. X-ray Detectors, RAVELLO, Sept. 1991, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A322, 442 (1992).Google Scholar
21. Hermon, H., Roth, M. and Schieber, M., Proc. Room Temperature Semicon. X-ray Detectors, RAVELLO, Sept. 1991, Nucl. Inst. Meth., A322, 432 (1992).Google Scholar
22. Steinberg, S., Kaplann, I., Schieber, M., Ortale, C., Skinner, N., Berg, L. Van den, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A–283, 123 (1989).Google Scholar
23. Burger, A., Morgan, S., He, C., Silberman, E., Schieber, M., Berg, L. Van den, Ortale, C. and Franks, L., J. Cryst. Growth 99, 988 (1990).Google Scholar
24. Roth, M., Burger, A., Nissenbaum, J. and Schieber, M., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS–34, 332 (1987).Google Scholar
25. Hermon, H., Ph.D. Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (1993).Google Scholar
26. Mohamed-Brahim, T., Phys. Stat. Sol. A65, K1 (1978).Google Scholar
27. Muller, J.C., Friant, A. and Siffert, P., Nucl. Inst. Meth., 150, 97 (1978).Google Scholar
28. Schieber, M., Ortale, C., Berg, L. Van den, Schnepple, W., Keller, L., Wagner, C.N.J., Yelon, W., Ross, F., Georgson, G. and Milstein, F., Nucl. Inst. Meth., A283, 172 (1989).Google Scholar