Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T03:01:21.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phonon States in Sic Small Particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Y. Sasaki
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Science, Ishinomaki Senshu University, Ishinomaki 986, JAPAN
C. Horie
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Science, Ishinomaki Senshu University, Ishinomaki 986, JAPAN
Y. Nishina
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Size dependence of optical phonon frequencies and that of phonon dampings of SiC small particles have been studied by analysing their Raman data. The particle size ranges from 30 nm to 1000 nm. Decrease in the TO-phonon frequency as well as the LT-splitting (the splitting between the LO- and TO-phonon) with decrease in the particle size are much larger than that expected from the spatial correlation model or that from the phonon confinement model. The phonon damping for the small particle consists of the usual temperature-dependent term and an excess damping term, which is independent of temperature. These results suggest that the scattering of the phonon at the particle surface plays a major role in determining the phonon states of the small particle. Our experimental data suggest that the surface phonon-polariton mode at the interface between the crystallites plays a minor role in the Raman spectrum of particles consisting of a number of crystallites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yajima, S., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 294, 419 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Sasaki, Y., Nishina, Y., Sato, M., and Okamura, K., Phys. Rev. B 40, 1762 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Maxwell-Garnett, J.C., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 203, 385 (1904).Google Scholar
4. Martin, T.P. and Genzel, L., Phys. Rev. B 8, 1630 (1973).Google Scholar
5. Sasaki, Y., Nishina, Y., Sato, M., and Okamura, K., Yogyo-Kyokai-Shi 94, 897 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Ruppin, R. and Englman, R., Rep. Prog. Phys. 33, 149 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Ruppin, R., J. Phys. C 8, 1969 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Olego, D. and Cardona, M., Phys. Rev. B 25, 3889 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Richter, H., Wang, Z.P., and Ley, L., Solid. State. Commun. 39, 625 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Feldman, D.W., Parker, J.H. Jr., Choyke, W.J., and Patrick, L., Phys. Revn. 173, 787 (1968).Google Scholar