Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:03:12.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Passivation of GaAs Mesfet's with PECVD Silicon Nitride Films of Different Stress States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Edward Y. Chang
Affiliation:
Unisys Corporation, Computer Systems Division, P. 0. Box 64525, St. Paul, MN 55164-0525
Gregory T. Cibuzar
Affiliation:
Unisys Corporation, Computer Systems Division, P. 0. Box 64525, St. Paul, MN 55164-0525
Thomas K. Yard
Affiliation:
Unisys Corporation, Computer Systems Division, P. 0. Box 64525, St. Paul, MN 55164-0525
Krishna P. Pande
Affiliation:
Unisys Corporation, Computer Systems Division, P. 0. Box 64525, St. Paul, MN 55164-0525
Get access

Abstract

The passivation of GaAs MESFET's with PECVD silicon nitride films of both compressive and tensile stresses is reported. The shift of MESFET parameters due to passivation was found to be dependent upon gate orientation. For example, it is found that the shifts of threshold voltage are of opposite sign for MESFET's oriented along [011] and [011] directions. Our experiments show that nitride of tensile stress is preferable for MESFET's with [011] oriented gates. The shifts in VTH IDSS and GM of the devices before and after nitride passivation are lesd thaw s% if the nitride of appropriate stress states are used for passivation.

Breakdown voltage of the MESFET's after nitride deposition was also studied. It is found that the process with higher hydrogen incorporation tends to reduce the surface oxide and increase the breakdown voltage after nitride deposition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wemple, S.H., Niehouse, W.C., Fukui, H., Irving, J.C., Cox, H.M., Huang, J.C.M., Delorenzo, J.V., and Schlosser, W.O., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Vol. ED–28, P. 834840 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Van Tuyl, R.L., Kumar, V., D'Avanzo, D.C., Taylor, T.W., Peterson, V.E., Hornbuckle, D.P., Fisher, R.A., Estreich, D.B., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Vol. ED–29, P. 935941 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Tenedorio, J.G., Terizian, P.A., IEEE Electronic Device Letters, Vol. EDL–5, No. 6, P.199202 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Claassen, W.A.P., Valkenburg, W.G.J.M., Wijgert, W.M.V.D., Willemsen, M.F.C., Thin Solid Films, 129, P. 239247 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Chow, R., Rosler, R.S., Landford, W.A., Wang, K., J. Electrochem. Soc. Extended Abstr. 802, P. 770772 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Mar, K.M., Samuelson, G.M., Solid State Technology, P. 137142 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Lanford, W.A., Rand, M.J., J. Appl. Phys., Vol.49, P. 24732477 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Schuermeyer, F.L., Thin Insulating Films Symposium Proceeding, edited by Vikram Kapoor, J., Stein, Herman J., P. 113–123 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Chang, M.F., Lee, C.P., Asbeck, P.M., Vahrenkamp, R.P., Kirkpatrick, C.G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 45 (3), P. 279281 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Asbeck, P.M., Lee, C.P., Chang, M.F., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Vol. ED–31, P. 13771380 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Onodera, T., Ohnishi, T., Yokoyama, N., Nishi, H., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Vol. ED–32, P. 23142318 (1985)Google Scholar
12. Ohnish, T., Onodera, T., Yokoyama, N., Nishi, H., IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. EDL–6, No. 4, P. 172174 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar