Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:51:54.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Parametric Analysis of Relative Humidity Effects on Traditional Panel Paintings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Eric Hagan ,
Evan Quasney  and
Marion Mecklenburg
Eric Hagan
Affiliation:
Art Conservation Program, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Evan Quasney
Affiliation:
SCMRE, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A
Marion Mecklenburg
Affiliation:
SCMRE, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

A finite element analysis was performed on panel painting structures subjected to changes in relative humidity. Measured Young's modulus values and humidity expansion coefficients were used to define the properties of materials characteristic to northern and southern European panels. Models of northern panels simulated white oak with two layers of oil paint, while models of southern panels simulated cottonwood with gesso and two oil paint layers. In both cases, the properties of the oil paints were input for lead white and Naples yellow respectively. Influence of radial/tangential grain orientation, panel thickness, and structural support were investigated through various humidity changes. Results are presented in the form of stress in the wood, gesso, and paint layers as well as curvature of the painted surfaces. Methods of reducing panel curvature with structural support are discussed, which involve applying a frictionless cradle, wood battens, or verso gesso layer. Verification of the model was performed with a derivation of general stress equations for a cradled painting with no friction between the slider-bars and the panel. A comparison of derived and parametric results confirms accurate behavior of the model.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 852 , 2004 , OO2.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dumortier, S. and De Wilde, W.P. in Structural studies of historical buildings IV. Volume 1: architectural studies, materials and analysis, edited by Brebbia, C.A. and Leftheris, B. (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1995) pp. 365–372.Google Scholar
2. Cross, W.B., Jones, N.P., in Structural Repair and Maintenance of Buildings III, edited by Brebbia, C. and Frewer, R. (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1993) pp. 391–398.Google Scholar
3. Mecklenburg, M.F., Tumosa, C.T., and McCormick-Goodhart, M.H. in Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III, edited by Vandiver, P.B., Druzik, J.R., Wheeler, G.S. and Freestone, I.C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 267, San Francisco, CA, 1992) pp. 337–358.Google Scholar
4. Mecklenburg, M.F., McCormick-Goodhart, M. and Tumosa, C.S., J. Am. Inst. Conserv. 33, 153–170 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Hutton, David, Fundamentals of Finite Element Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003).Google Scholar
6. Gere, J.M. and Timoshenko, S.P., Mechanics of Materials, 3rd Ed. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995)Google Scholar
7. Boley, Bruno and Weiner, Jerome, Theory of Thermal Stresses (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1960) p. 429.Google Scholar
8. Dardes, Kathleen and Rothe, Andrea, The Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings (Cronicle Books, San Francisco, 2004).Google Scholar
9. Nicolaus, Knut, in The Restoration of Paintings, edited by Westphal, C. (Konemann Verlag, Germany, 1999), p. 63.Google Scholar
10. Buck, R.D., Studies in Conservation 7, pp. 71–74 (1962).Google Scholar
11. Mecklenburg, Marion in Gilded Wood: Conservation and History (1991) Some Mechanical and Physical Properties of Gilding Gesso. edited by Bigelow, D. et al. (Sound View Press, Madison, 1991) p. 163–170.Google Scholar