Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T20:13:19.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orientation Effects on Pyroelectric Properties of Solution - Derived Bismuth Titanate Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Tran D. Khang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0012, USA.
Relva C. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0012, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Ferroelectric bismuth titanate (Bi4Ti3O12) thin films with controlled degree of c-orientation were fabricated on Pt/Si substrate by solution spin-casting technique. The degree of c-orientation of the films was characterized by XRD analysis and Raman spectroscopy. Film properties such as dielectric constant, dielectric loss factor, spontaneous polarization, and coercive field varied over the range of (119–87), (0.04–0.015), (8–4 μC/cm2), and (30-20 kV/cm), respectively as the degree of c- orientation of the films increased from 0.3 to 0.85. Values for the pyroelectric coefficient, voltage responsivity, and voltage figure of merit were also evaluated. These properties exhibited strong dependence on the degree of c-orientation of the films and, for highly oriented films, reached values of 9.5 nC/°C. cm2, 62 V/W, and 0.4×10−10 C. cm/J, respectively. The inter-correlation between degree of c-orientation, grain morphology, and pyroelectric properties of the films were explored in this study.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Aurivillius, B., Arkiv for Kemi 1, 58, 499 (1950).Google Scholar
2. Subbarao, E. C., Phys. Rev. 122(3), 804 (1961).Google Scholar
3. Cummins, S. E. and Cross, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 39(5), 2268 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Withers, R. L., Thompson, J. G., and Rae, A. D., J. Solid Stat. Chem. 94, 404 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Fouskova, A. and Cross, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 41(7), 2834 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Kim, Sei K., Miyayama, M., and Yanagida, H., Mater. Res. Bull. 31(1), 121 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Kourouklis, G. A., Jayaraman, A., and van Uitert, L. G., Mater. Lett. 5(3), 116 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Cross, L. E. and Hardtl, K. H. in Ferroelectrics, edited by Martin Grayson (Encyclopedia of Semiconductor Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 1984), p. 239.Google Scholar
9. Cote, C. and De Silva, A. W., Rev. Sci. Instru. 67(12), 4146 (1996).Google Scholar
10 Lotgering, F. K., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 9, 113 (1959).Google Scholar
11. Byer, R. L. and Roundy, C. B., Ferroelectrics 3, 333 (1972).Google Scholar
12. Betsch, Regis J. and White, William B., Electrochim. Acta 34A, 505 (1977).Google Scholar
13. Idink, H., Srikanth, V., White, William B., and Subbarao, E. C., J. Appl. Phys. 76(3), 1819 (1994).Google Scholar
14. Yamaguchi, M., Kawanabe, K., Nagatomo, T., and Omoto, O., Mater. Sei. Eng. B41, 138 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Xiaoli, W. and Xi, Y., Ferroelectrics Letters 13, 47 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Takenaka, T. and Sakata, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, Suppl. 22–2, 53 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Brody, Philip S., Ferroelectrics 38, 939 (1981).Google Scholar
18. Simhoney, M. and Shaulov, A., J. Appl. Phys. 42(10), 3741 (1971).Google Scholar
19. Porter, S. G., Ferroelectrics 33, 193 (1981).Google Scholar
20. Ludlow, J. H., Mitchell, W. H., Putley, E. H., and Shaw, N., J. Sci. Instr. 44, 694 (1967).Google Scholar