Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T23:07:06.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organometallic Epitaxy of Extrinsic N-Type HgCdTe Using Trimethylindium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

N.R. Taskar
Affiliation:
Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
K.K. Parat
Affiliation:
Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
I.B. Bhat
Affiliation:
Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
S.K. Chandhi
Affiliation:
Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
Get access

Abstract

Indium doping of mercury cadmium telluride, grown by organometallic epitaxy, has been accomplished using trimethylindium (TMIn) as the dopant source. Layers, grown by the Direct Alloy Growth (DAG) process, exhibited a linear doping vs TMIn partial pressure characteristic over the 5 × 1016 to 3 × 1018 cm−3 range. A maximum doping concentration of 5 × 1018 cm−3 was obtained in these layers.

The optical band edge in these layers was observed to move to higher energy with increased doping. It is shown that this is caused by the Burstein-Moss shift of the bandedge with doping, and that the Cd fraction is independent of the doping concentration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Irvine, S.J. and Mullin, J.B., J. Crys. Growth, 55, 107 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ghandhi, S.K. and Bhat, I.B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 779 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Hoke, W.E., Lemonias, P.J. and Taczewski, R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 45, 1092 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Ghandhi, S.K., Bhat, I.B. and Fardi, H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 52, 392 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Thompson, J., Mackett, P., Smith, L.M., Cole-Hamilton, D.J. and ShenaiKhatkhate, D.V., J. Crys. Growth, 86, 233 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Vydyanath, H.R. and Kroger, F.A., J. Electron. Mater., 11, 111 (1982}.Google Scholar
7. Ghandhi, S.K., Taskar, N.R., Parat, K.K. and Bhat, I.B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57 (3) 252 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Whiteley, J.S., Koppel, P., Conger, V.L. and Owens, R.E., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., A6 (4) 2804 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Boukerche, M., Reno, J., Sou, I.K., Hsu, C. and Faurie, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 48, 1733, 1986.Google Scholar
10. Qian, D., Tang, W., Shen, J., Chu, J. and Zheng, C., Sol. St. Comm., 56, 813, 1985.Google Scholar