Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:45:57.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of Microstructure and Dislocation Dynamics in InxGa1-xP Graded Buffers Grown on GaP by Movpe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A.Y. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
E.A. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

To engineer high-quality InxGal-xP graded buffers on GaP substrates (InxGa1-xP/GaP), we have explored the evolution of microstructure and dislocation dynamics in these materials. We show that the primarily limiting factor in obtaining high-quality InxGa1-xP/GaP is a new defect microstructure that we call branch defects. Branch defects pin dislocations and result in dislocation pileups that cause an escalation in threading dislocation density with continued grading. The morphology of branch defects is dominated by growth temperature, which can be used to suppress the strength or density of branch defects. In the absence of branch defects, we observe nearly ideal dislocation dynamics that are controlled by the kinetics of dislocation glide. This new understanding results in two primary design rules for achieving high-quality materials: 1) control branch defects, and 2) maximize dislocation glide kinetics. Combining these design rules into optimization strategies, we develop and demonstrate processes based on single and multiple growth temperatures. With optimization, threading dislocation densities below 5 × 106 cm−2 are achieved out to x = 0.39 and a nearly steady-state relaxation process is recovered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nakwaski, W., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 159 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Fitzgerald, E.A., Mat. Sci. Rep. 7 (3), 87 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Abrahams, M.S., Buiocchi, C.J., Olsen, G.H., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4259 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Stinson, L.J., Yu, J.G., Lester, S.D., Peanasky, M.J., Park, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2012 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Chin, T.P., Chang, J.C.P., Kavanagh, K.L., Tu, C.W., Kirchner, P.D., Woodall, J.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2369 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Kim, A.Y., Fitzgerald, E.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 510, 131 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Casey, H., Panish, M., Heterostructure Lasers Part B, Academic Press: San Diego (1978).Google Scholar
8. Abrahams, M.S., Buiocchi, C.J., Olsen, G.H., J. Appl. Phys. 46, 4259 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Abrahams, M.S., Weisberg, L.R., Buiocchi, C.J., Blanc, J., J. Mat. Sci. 4, 223 (1969).Google Scholar
10. Samavedam, S.B., Fitzgerald, E.A., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3108 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Kim, A.Y., McCullough, W.S., Fitzgerald, E.A., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
12. Yonenaga, I., Sumino, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 48 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Yonenaga, I., Sumino, K., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 1681 (1993).Google Scholar
14. Stringfellow, G., Organometallic Vapor-Phase Epitaxy, Academic Press: Boston (1989).Google Scholar