Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:27:23.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical and Magnetic Properties of Silica Implanted with N+ and Fe+

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

T. Isobe
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama 223, Japan, isobe@applc.keio.ac.jp.
R.A. Weeks
Affiliation:
Applied Science and Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, U.S.A., ravv@vuse.vanderbilt.edu.
R.A. Zuhr
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, U.S.A., zur@solid.ssd.ornl.gov.
Get access

Abstract

Silica platelets (Corning 7940) were implanted sequentially with N at 52 keV to different doses ranging from 0 to 1.2×l017 ions cm2 and then with Fe at 160 keV to a dose of 6×10 ions cm2. The optical absorption decreased with increasing N1 dose at photon energies ranging from 1.4 eV to 6.5 eV. The relative intensity, S(0°), of the ferromagnetic resonance absorption and its resonance field, H(0°), at θ = 0° were larger than S(90°) and H,(90°) at 0 = 90°, where Θ is the angle between the applied magnetic field and the normal to the implanted surface. The maximum values of S(0°) and S(90°) were observed near the N/Fe atomic ratio of 0.2. At the similar atomic ratio, the differential relative intensity, S(0°)- S(90°), and the differential resonance field, H,(0°)-H,(90°). associated with the degree of magnetic interaction between the produced compounds, also showed maxima. We conclude that sequential ion-implantation of N1 and Fe1 into silica causes a chemical interaction to produce iron nitrides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zuhr, R.A., Magruder, M.H. III, Anderson, T.A. and Wittig, J.B., edited by R.J. Culbertson, O.W. Holland, K.S. Jones and K. Maex, (Mat. Res. Sci. Symp. Proc. 316, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994), p. 457.Google Scholar
2 Perez, A., Treilleux, M., Capra, T. and Griscom, D.L., J. Mater. Res. 2, 910 (1987).Google Scholar
3 Nakajima, K., Yamashita, T., Takata, M. and Okamoto, S., J. Appl. Phys. 15, 6033(1991).Google Scholar
4 Nakajima, K., Okamoto, S., Takata, M. and Sekizawa, H., J. Mag. Soc. Jpn. 15, 703(1991).Google Scholar
5 Biersack, J.P. and Haggmarl, L.G., Nucl. Inst. Meth. 174, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
6 Griscom, D.L., Krebs, J.J., Perez, A. and Treilleux, M., Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B32, 272(1988).Google Scholar
7 Isobe, T., Park, S.Y., Weeks, R.A. and Zuhr, R.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 189, 173(1995).Google Scholar