Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:37:01.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Geometric Models for Interphase Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Hans J. Fecht
Hans J. Fecht*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, 138-78, Pasadena, CA 91125, U.S.A. Permenant address: Universität Augsburg, Institut für Physik, 8900 Augsburg, F.R.G.
Get access

Abstract

The energy interphase boundaries can be described as a function of the lattice matching at the interface between two adjacent crystals, the chemical interaction and the interfacial entropy of the boundaries. Geometric models relating the energy of interphase boundaries (metal/metal and metal/non-metal) to their atomic structure can be based on the static distortion wave concept. This approach constitutes the physical basis for the lock-in model and the planar CSL-model proposed previously to describe the low energy configurations of such interfaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 187: Symposium J – Thin Film Structures and Phase Stability , 1990 , 293
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Matthews, J.W., Epitaxial Growth, Academic Press (1975)Google Scholar
[2] Fecht, H.J. and Gleiter, H., Acta Metall., 33, 557 (1985)Google Scholar
[3] Fecht, H.J., Acta Metall., 36, 689 (1988)Google Scholar
[4] Balluffi, R.W., Brokman, A., and King, A.H., Acta Metall., 30, 1453 (1982)Google Scholar
[5] Int. Conf. on “Interface Science and Engineering '87”, Raj, R. and Sass, S.L. eds., J. Phys., Paris, 49 C-5 (1988)Google Scholar
[6] McTague, J.P. and Novaco, A.D., Phys. Rev. B, 19, 5299 (1979),Google Scholar
[7] Novaco, A.D. and McTague, J.P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 38, 1286 (1977)Google Scholar
[8] Fletcher, N.H., J. Appl. Phys., 35, 235 (1964)Google Scholar
[9] Markov, I. and Stoyanov, S., Contemp. Phys., 28, 267 (1987)Google Scholar
[10] Villain, J. and Gordon, M.B., Surf. Sci., 125, 1 (1983)Google Scholar
[11] Fecht, H.J., Phil. Mag. Lea., 60, 81 (1989)Google Scholar
[12] Steele, W.A., Surf. Sci., 36, 317 (1973)Google Scholar
[13] Gao, Y., Shewmon, P., and Dregia, S.A., Scripta Metall., 22, 1521 (1988)Google Scholar