Skip to main content Accessibility help

Ohmic Contact Formation to Doped GaN

  • L. L. Smith (a1), M. D. Bremser (a1), E. P. Carlson (a1), T. W. Weeks (a1), Y. Huang (a2), M. J. Kim (a2), R.W. Carpenter (a2) and R. F. Davis (a1)...


Ohmic contact strategies for n- and p-type GaN have been investigated electrically, chemically, and microstructurally using transmission line measurements, high-resolution EELS and cross-sectional TEM, respectively. The contributions to contact performance from work function differences, carrier concentrations, annealing treatments, and interface metallurgy have been examined. The contact materials of Ti, TiN, Au, and Au/Mg were deposited via electron beam evaporation; Al was deposited via thermal evaporation. As-deposited Al and TiN contacts to highly doped n-GaN were ohmic, with room-temperature specific contact resistivities of 8.6×10−5 Ω cm2 and 2.5×10−5 Ωcm2 respectively. The Ti contacts developed low-resistivity ohmic behavior as a result of annealing; TiN contacts also improved with further heat treatment. For p-GaN, Au became ohmic with annealing, while Au/Mg contacts were ohmic in the as-deposited condition. The performance, structure, and composition of different contact schemes varied widely from system to system. An integrated analysis of the results of this study is presented below and coupled with a discussion of the most appropriate contact systems for both n- and p-type GaN.



Hide All
1 Rideout, V.L., Solid-St. Electron. 18 541 (1975).
2 Williams, R., Modern GaAs Processing Techniques (Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1990) pp. 211227.
3 Shen, T. C., Gao, G. B., Morkoç, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10 (5) 2113 (1992).
4 Marshall, E.D. and Murakami, M., in Contacts to Semiconductors, edited by Brillson, L.J. (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1993) pp. 166.
5 Henisch, H.K., Semiconductor Contacts. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984) pp. 4371.
6 Rhoderick, E.H. and Williams, R.H., Metal-Semiconductor Contacts. 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988), pp. 1117.
7 Kurtin, S., McGill, T.C. and Mead, C.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (26) 1433 (1969).
8 Smith, L.L. and Davis, R.F., in Properties of Group III Nitrides. EMIS DataReview Series No. 11, ed. by Edgar, J.H. (INSPEC, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1994) pp. 288292.
9 Foresi, J.S., Thesis, M.S., Boston University, 1992.
10 Foresi, J.S. and Moustakas, T.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (22) 2859 (1993).
11 Hacke, P., Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., and Sawaki, N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (19) 2676 (1993).
12 Khan, M.R.H., Detchprohm, T., Hacke, P., Hiramatsu, K., and Sawaki, N., J. Phys. D 28 1169 (1995).
13 Binari, S.C., Dietrich, H.B., and Kelner, G., Electronics Lett. 30 (11) 909 (1994).
14 Reeves, G.K. and Harrison, H.B., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL–3 111 (1982).
15 Huang, Y., Smith, L., Kim, M. J., Carpenter, R. W. and Davis, R. F. in Evolution of Thin-Film and Surface Structure and Morphology, edited by Demczyk, B. G., Williams, E. D., Garfunkel, E., Clemens, B. M., and Cuomo, J. E. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 355, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995) pp. 433439.
16 Lin, M.E., Ma, Z., Huang, F.Y., Fan, Z.F., Allen, L.H., and Morkoç, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 (8) 1003 (1994).


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed